Page 193 - Key Words in Religion Media and Culture
P. 193

176  Dorothea E. Schulz

             media engagement, and debate (Nelson 2001, ch. 7; Hirschkind 2006, ch.
             4; Schulz 2004, ch. 9; 2006).
               How can the concept of soundscape help to elucidate the complex and
             dynamic process of religious mediation and of making religious subjectivities
             in Muslim contexts and beyond?


             Soundscape: origins and uses of the term
             The origins of “soundscape,” sometimes used interchangeably with “acoustic
             space,” can be traced back to three fields of scholarly debate since the 1950s.
             The first field of scholarly debate in which it gained currency is represented
             by the journal Explorations (1953–9) created by McLuhan and Carpenter,
             who, in their endeavor to counter predominant scholarly assumptions about
             the  hegemony  of  vision  as  principal  mode  of  perception  in  modernity,
             introduced the notion of acoustic space. Their University of Toronto Center
             for Culture and Technology project focused on media transformations and
             sought  to  reinterpret  a  Western  history  of  orality  and  literacy  from  the
             vantage point of twentieth-century electronic communications. Though both
             authors shared an interest in relating studies of perception to transformations
             brought about by new media technologies, they pursued distinct analytical
             trajectories. Whereas McLuhan in his later work tended to contrast different
             sensual forms of perception and thereby risked to replace visualism with
             a  similarly  fallacious  “audi-centrism,”  Carpenter  came  to  emphasize  the
             interrelationship between these perceptual modes. His article on acoustic
             space (1960) explored the cultural implications of the “earpoint,” whereas
             in later publications, he looked at the interplay between the visual and the
             auditory as combined forms of perception.
               In  the  mid-1950s,  the  term  auditory  space  also  gained  currency  in
             scholarship reflecting on new developments in music studies. Here, it was
             introduced by the music philosopher Zuckerkand (1956) who, while drawing
             on Heidegger and Bergson, coined the term to emphasize the interpenetration
             of auditory space and time. Other authors, among them Murray Schafer, used
             the term to pinpoint the artificial nature of the distinction between “music,”
             “sound,”  and  “noise”  and  to  argue  that  what  was  commonly  referred  to
             as “music” should be appreciated by reference to its location in a wider,
             culturally and historically specific topography (or “scape”) of sound forms.
             Influenced  by  the  anthropologist  Carpenter,  Schafer  was  instrumental  in
             organizing the World Soundscape Project centering on an exploration of the
             complexities of the “soundscape design” and “acoustic ecology” of Western
             society and synthesized in Schafer’s “The Tuning of the World” (1977; also
             see Attali 1977; Russolo 1986). Developments in installation arts similarly
             focused on explorations of soundscapes by emphasizing the synaesthetic and
   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198