Page 194 - Key Words in Religion Media and Culture
P. 194

Soundscape  177

             “full-bodied”  nature  of  sound  perception  and  linking  sound  sensation  to
             spatial orientation and movement (e.g. McCartney 2004).
               The concept of soundscape also became central to anthropological and
             ethnomusicological studies of “acoustemology,” which took the concept
             into  different  analytical  directions.  Rather  than  exploring  the  “acoustic
             ecology”  of  particular  social  environments,  anthropological  studies  of
             soundscape focused mostly on how people imagine, respond to, hear places
             as  sensually  sonic  (see  Feld  1996:  96).  Though  most  authors  employed
             the  term  primarily  in  reaction  to  the  ocularcentrism  of  conventional
             scientific  discourse  and  to  the  presumed  primacy  of  vision  to  Western
             epistemology, the conclusions (and agendas) they drew from this heuristic
             perspective  were  actually  very  different.  Authors  such  as  Ong  posited
             (and essentialized) vision as being the characteristic perceptual mode of
             Western  modernity  and  contrasted  it  to  the  alleged  centrality  of  smell,
             taste, sound in non-Western societies (Ong 1981 [1967]; also see Burrows
             1990;  Classen  1993;  Beck  2006).  Other  authors,  in  contrast,  criticized
             the McLuhanite tendency to think along, and reify, a visual-auditory great
             divide and its underlying assumption that “seeing is analytic and reflective,
             sound is active and generative” (Schafer 1985: 96). They warned against
             countering “commonsensical” assumptions of the centrality of visualism in
             Western analytic discourse by erecting an anti-visualism (e.g., Gouk 1991;
             Schmidt 2000). Instead, they emphasized the need to analyze all registers
             of  sensual  perception  in  their  interplay.  To  them,  thinking  about  sound
             and  soundscape  formed  part  of  a  larger  anthropological  exploration  of
             the senses. Accordingly, they considered soundscape as a domain in which
             aural sensation interacts with other perceptual modes, conveys a sense of
             orientation (e.g., Idhe 1976; Howes 1991, 2004; Bull and Back 2003), and
             serves to inhabit memory (Casey 1987[1976]; Corbin 1998; Smith 1999).
             Rather than ontologizing “culturally specific” orders of sensual perception,
             they  emphasized  that  modes  of  sensory  dominance  change  contextually
             with bodily emplacement (e.g., Feld 1991; 1996).


             Soundscape and/as religious mediation

             How,  then,  can  these  scholarly  approaches  to  the  study  of  soundscape
             be  brought  to  bear  on  explorations  of  the  relationship  between  sound
             sensation and religious mediation, of sound sensation as a form of religious
             mediation? Practices and technologies related to the aural-oral mediation
             of religious experience illustrate that “religion” itself should be understood
             as a form of mediation (de Vries and Weber 2001; Stolow 2005). Similar
             to  “communication,”  religion  refers  to  the  act  of  establishing  contact,  of
             binding together two different entities or realities; in short, of mediating
   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199