Page 106 -
P. 106

Knowledge Management Models                                            89



               give coherence to organizational intelligence. Permeable boundaries are essential if
               ideas are to be exchanged and built upon. Finally, multidimensionality represents
               organizational fl exibility that ensures that the knowledge workers have the competen-
               cies, perspectives, and cognitive ability to address issues and solve problems. This is
               sometimes seen as being analogous to developing human instinct.
                    Each of these characteristics must emerge from the nature of the organization. They
               cannot be designed by managerial decree — only nurtured, guided, and helped along.
               In summary, there are four major ways in which the ICAS model describes organiza-
               tional knowledge management:
                 1.   Creativity
                 2.   Problem solving
                 3.   Decision making
                 4.   Implementation

                    Creativity is the generation of new ideas, perspectives, understanding, concepts,
               and methods to help solve problems, build products, offer services, and so on. Indi-
               viduals, teams, networks, or virtual communities can solve problems and they take
               the outputs of the creative processes as their inputs. Decision making is the selection
               of one or more alternatives that were generated during the problem solving process
               and implementation is the carrying out of the selected alternative(s) in order to obtain
               the desired results.
                    Complex-adaptive-system-theory-based KM models are defi nitely showing both an
               evolution and a return to systems-thinking roots in the KM world. All of the models
               presented in this chapter are relevant and each offers valuable theoretical foundations
               in understanding knowledge management in today ’ s organizations. What they all
               share is a connectionist and holistic approach to better understand the nature of
               knowledge as a complex adaptive system that includes knowers, the organizational
               environment, and the  “ bloodstream ”  of organizations — the knowledge-sharing
               networks.


                 The European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) KM Model
                 The EFQM model ( Bhatt 2000 ,  2001 ,  2002 ) looks at the way in which knowledge
               management is used to attain the goals of an organization. This model is based on
               traditional models of quality and excellence, so there are very strong links between
               KM processes and expected organizational results.   Figure 3.12  shows the major com-
               ponents of the EQFM KM model.
   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111