Page 204 -
P. 204

Knowledge Application                                                 187



               a few lines of documentation will rarely be enough to facilitate knowledge transfer.
               Other researchers such as  Hatami, Galliers, and Huang (2003)  found that a key to
               organizational success in the face of global competition is the ability to capture orga-
               nizational learning, to effectively reuse the knowledge through effi cient means, and
               to synthesize these into more intelligent problem recognition, strategic analysis, and
               choices in strategic directions. By tapping into their organization ’ s memory, decision
               makers can make more intelligent business decisions. This is achieved when indivi-
               duals access data, information, and knowledge residing in repositories. However,
               retrieval alone is not enough. Knowledge application must follow. The success of
               knowledge application appears to be a function of the characteristics of the individual,
               of the knowledge content, the purpose of reuse for the particular task at hand, and
               the organizational context or culture.


                 Knowledge Application at the Individual Level

                 Characteristics of Individual Knowledge Workers
                 Individual differences play a major role in knowledge-sharing behaviors ( Hicks and
               Tochtermann 2001 ). Knowledge workers vary with respect to their familiarity with
               the subject matter and their personality and cognitive styles.  Cohen and Levinthal
               (1990)  found that sharing is more likely to occur when a foundation of prior relevant
               knowledge exists. A number of studies (e.g.,  Ford et al. 2002 ;  Kuhlthau 1993 ;  Spink
               et al. 2002 ) found signifi cant correlations between online searching behaviors and the
               Paskian cognitive styles of holistic and operational learners. On the other hand, the
               business world heavily favors the use of instruments such as the Myer-Briggs Type
               Indicator (MBTI) personality style assessment ( Myers et al. 1998 ) to assess differences
               in personality styles. Some research has been done to correlate MBTI type with
               knowledge-sharing behaviors (e.g.,  Webb, 1998 ), found in a study of the consulting
               fi rm Price Waterhouse Coopers that a strong outgoing personality was important in
               knowledge sharing irrespective of qualifi cations and prior experience.
                    Characteristics of the individual who is seeking to apply or reuse knowledge are
               likely to play a role in how effective they are at fi nding, understanding, and making
               use of organizational knowledge. Individual characteristics may include, for example,
               personality style, their preferences regarding how they best learn, and how they prefer
               to receive their information, as well as how they can best be helped to put the knowl-
               edge to work. This may range from something as simple as asking for and subsequently
               accommodating the language the user prefers to work in to more sophisticated model-
               ing of the user in terms of their abilities and their goals. One good framework that is
   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209