Page 208 -
P. 208

Knowledge Application                                                 191





                                      Birds



               build their nests in                  fly using their
                                       eat



                     Trees            Worms             Wings



                                                       made of



                                                       Feathers


                 Figure 6.5
                 Example of a semantic network (continued)

                 Bloom ’ s Taxonomy of Learning Objectives
                 Bloom, Mesia, and Krathwohl (1964) divided knowledge into a hierarchical scheme
               that distinguishes between psychomotor skills, the affective domain (e.g., attitudes),
               and the cognitive domain (e.g., knowledge). The latter is the one that is more com-
               monly used although attitudinal changes are often required in KM as well. Bloom
               emphasizes that learning is hierarchical with learning (objectives) at the highest level
               as dependent on the achievement of lower level knowledge and skills fi rst.
                    The cognitive domain taxonomy is shown in   table 6.1 . The levels shown are from
               low (1, knowledge) to high (6, evaluation). The affective domain includes the manner
               in which we deal with things emotionally, such as feelings, values, appreciation,
               enthusiasms, motivations, and attitudes. The fi ve major categories of affective domain
               are listed in   table 6.2 .
                    The psychomotor domain includes physical movement, coordination, and use of
               the motor skill areas. Development of these skills requires practice and is measured in
               terms of speed, precision, distance, procedures, or techniques in execution. The seven
               major categories listed in   table 6.3 .
                    These taxonomic categories can be used  “ inside out ”  to help understand what
               users are trying to do. The level of internalization can be identifi ed for effective
   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213