Page 236 -
P. 236
Knowledge Application 219
7. How does knowledge application relate to the internalization phase of the Nonaka
and Takeuchi knowledge spiral model that was presented in Chapter 3?
8. Discuss why counting the number of “ hits ” to a knowledge-repository (much like
Web site statistics) would not be the best measure of knowledge application within
an organization.
9. What is chunking? Why is this a good content management strategy? How
would you take advantage of chunking for individual and organizational
knowledge application situations? How could an e-learning system make good use of
chunking?
10. Provide an example of a task analysis for a task you are familiar with. What are
the major challenges in designing an EPSS based on such a task analysis? How would
you address these challenges?
Note
1. See the journal on KM and E-Learning at: http://kmel-journal.org/ojs/index.php/online-
publication.
References
Barron , T. 2000 . A smarter Frankenstein: the merging of e-learning and knowledge management .
LearningCircuits, August, http://www.learningcircuits.org (accessed June 4, 2010).
Bloom, B ., ed. 1956 . Taxonomy of educational objectives. Book 1: Cognitive domain . New York :
Longman .
Bloom , B. , B. Mesia , and R. Krathwohl . 1964 . Taxonomy of educational objectives. Volumes 1 and
2 . New York : David McKay .
Chmielewski , T. , and D. Dansereau . 1998 . Enhancing the recall of text: Knowledge mapping
training promotes implicit transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology 90 : 407 – 413 .
Cohen , W. M. , and D. Levinthal . 1990 . Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and
innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35 : 128 – 152 .
Davenport , T. , D. De Long , and M. Beers . 1998 . Successful knowledge management projects. Sloan
Management Review 39 ( 2 ): 43 – 57 .
Dickleman , G. 2003 . EPSS revisited: A lifecycle for developing performance-centred systems . Silver
Spring, MD : International Society for Performance Improvement .
Dixon , N. 2000 . Common knowledge: How companies thrive by sharing what they know . Boston :
Harvard Business School Press .