Page 370 -
P. 370

The Value of Knowledge Management                                     353



                   Table 10.1
                 Sample BSC implementation

                                           Objectives   Metrics     Targets     Initiatives
                   Financial

                   Customer
                   Internal processes
                   Learning and growth



                 3.   Communicate and link: measure as you go through the objectives and look at how
               well the reward system is linked to these objectives: are employees trained, motivated,
               and rewarded to use KM as part of their everyday work?
                 4.   Do a reality check — be sure that you are being detailed enough that you can
               measure something to assess how well these objectives are being met.
                 5.   Incorporate learning and feedback into your metrics — do a formative and a sum-
               mative evaluation.
                    Each dimension of the BSC can be further expanded to include objectives, metrics,
               targets, and initiatives, as shown in   table 10.1 . Objectives are the major goals to be
               achieved (e.g., profi table growth). Metrics are the parameters that will be monitored
               in order to measure progress toward these stated goals (e.g., growth in net margin).
               Targets are the specifi c thresholds to be met for each metric (e.g., 2 percent or greater
               growth in net margin). Finally, initiatives describe the actions, projects, programs, and
               so on, to be put into place in order to be able to meet the stated goals.
                    The balanced scorecard method was originally intended to be a performance
               improvement metric, but it quickly became apparent that it also serves as an effective
               strategic management system. It is applicable to both nonprofi t and for profi t organi-
               zations as well as to both private and public sector companies. The BSC offers a
               number of signifi cant advantages including the translation of abstract goals into
               action items that can be continuously monitored. It provides objective measures of
               the current situation and also helps in initiating the changes required to move from
               the current to the desired future state of the company. The major shortcoming is that
               unlike benchmarking, this is a much more diffi cult technique to use. Each BSC must
               be developed  “ from scratch ”  as it is customized to individual organizations. Some
               templates and automated tools are available to help in the implementation of a BSC
               from, for example, Six Sigma (available at http://www.isixsigma.com/me/balanced
               _scorecard/) and QPR (available at http://www.qpr.com/balancedscorecard/).
   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375