Page 188 - Leadership Lessons of the White House Fellows
P. 188

LEADERS ARE PERSUASIVE

             the hydrogen bomb, and learned that it was possible to calculate with con-
             fidence a warhead’s flight path; that was the first step toward being able to
             intercept a missile. “As for guidance and propulsion, there had been a lot
             of gains in that too. The scientists didn’t all agree uniformly, but there was
             a consensus that yes, if you threw a lot of money at this, we would advance
             our ability some day,” McFarlane said. “None of them said that we could
             build this during Reagan’s term. But we could advance our ability to some
             day defend against a missile attack, and it would bankrupt the Soviet
             Union. I told the president that if he were to invest money in this, the
             Soviets would see the writing on the wall and they would come his way on
             arms control because they wouldn’t want to go bankrupt. They’d reduce
             their systems, and we’d win.”
                 The trouble was that the MAD doctrine had worked for more than
             three decades. Getting the public, Congress, and the allies to abandon that
             successful strategy in favor of unknown and seemingly far-fetched tech-
             nology would be a challenge. However, Reagan was committed to putting
             an end to the arms race, and he and his advisors launched a systematic
             approach to drum up support for the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI),
             dubbed by some “Star Wars,” a space-based defense system that relied on
             laser beans and infrared, radar, and optical detection systems not only to
             protect the United States physically from nuclear attack but also to break
             the Soviets’ confidence in their ability to compete. Reagan decided to take
             his pro-SDI campaign straight to the American public first and attempt to
             persuade them that it was the right thing to do.
                 “If he had gone to the leadership of the Congress and said he wanted
             to overturn thirty-five years of successful strategy for something that
             might not even work, it would have been strangled in the crib, and I
             think that he was right about that,” explained McFarlane. “Starting with
             the people at the grass roots was a perfect situation from my point of
             view because it made Ronald Reagan the advocate, and he could sell ice
             cubes to Eskimos. He was just great at selling things. So the idea was
             basically for him to tell the public, ‘We don’t have any way of defending
             you right now against a missile coming in, and I’m going to build one
             for you,’ and that’s a winner. The economy was just beginning to turn
             around after the recession of 1981, and Reagan’s tax cuts had begun to
             produce a rebound at the end of 1982. His political capital was relatively
             high at that point.”

                                           173
   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193