Page 210 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition
P. 210

196   LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT HANDBOOK

                   •  The  impact  assessment  of  ExLCA focuses  on  the  determination
                      of  the  exergies  of  the  flows,  and  the  exergy  destructions  and
                      exergy  efficiencies  of  the  overall  process  and  its  subprocesses.
                      Determination  of exergy contents  of flows is often  a combination
                      of utilizing  data  reported  in the literature  or by  relevant  organi-
                      zations  and  calculating  data  with  exergy  analysis  (as  noted  in
                      section  8.3.2). A limited impact classification  phase is included  in
                      ExLCA.
                   •  The  improvement   analysis  in  ExLCA  is  intended  to  reduce  its
                      life  cycle irreversibilities  (Hermann,  2006). The summation  of all
                      exergy  destructions  in  the  life  cycle, which  are  calculated  using
                      exergy analysis, identifies the life cycle irreversibility  of the prod-
                      uct or the process.


                 Throughout ExLCA, the calculation of exergy values requires that the condi-
              tions and composition  of the reference environment be  specified.


              8.4.4  Applications   of  ExLCA

              Relations between  exergy and  environmental  impact have been reported  and
              applied  by  many  researchers.  Some  of  the  more  significant  applications  are
              described here.
                 Ayres et ah (1998) argue in an article on exergy, waste accounting, and  life-
              cycle  analysis  that  thermodynamics  offers  a  means  of  accounting  for  both
              resource inputs and waste outputs in a systematic and uniform way. They con-
              clude that exergy is appropriate for general statistical use, both as a measure of
              resource stocks and  flows and as a measure  of waste emissions and the poten-
              tial for causing environmental harm.
                 Daniel  and  Rosen  (2002)  examine  material  emissions  produced  during  13
              fuel  cycles  for  automobiles,  on  mass and  exergy bases. Chemical  exergies  of
              fuel  life cycle emissions are compared with the masses  of fuel  cycle emissions.
              For  the  emissions  data  used,  the  chemical  exergy  results  suggest  that  com-
              pressed natural gas use in motor vehicles produces emissions that are the  fur-
              thest  from  equilibrium with the natural environment, relative to all other  fuel
              life cycle paths considered. It is also shown that diesel use in grid-independent
              hybrid electric vehicles has the lowest chemical exergies of emissions for all 13
              fuel-vehicle  combinations  considered,  suggesting  a lower  potential  for  envi-
              ronmental impact. It is concluded  that the exergy methodology presented  for
              assessing  the  potential  for  environmental  impact  may  help  in  the  develop-
              ment and design  of transportation technologies that are more environmentally
              benign than those presently used.
                 Neelis et ah (2004) analyze a several hydrogen production and hydrogen stor-
              age systems for automotive applications using exergetic life cycle assessment.
              Eight  different  fuel  supply  and  use  chains are analysed  exergetically.  Exergy
              analysis is shown to provide considerable additional useful  information  com-
              pared  to  conventional  energy  analysis  based  on  the  lower  or  higher  heating
   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215