Page 263 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition
P. 263

LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT AND END OF LIFE      251

              perspective encourages waste planners to consider the environmental aspects
              of the entire system including activities that occur outside of the traditional
              framework of activities from the point of waste collection to final disposal, as
              well as outside of cities and regions where wastes are generated. Since many
              cities and regions transport their waste out of their community or state for man-
              agement and disposal, the impacts of managing waste generated are not often
              captured. LCA helps bring the "out-of-sight, out-of-mind" into sight and mind.
                Waste management is a challenging issue because it must balance the techno-
              logical, economic, environmental, and social dimensions. All of these play key
              roles in the decision making process for waste management. Understanding
              these multi-dimensional relationships is necessary for reaching sustainable
              solutions. LCA provides a key piece to understanding the broad environmen-
              tal aspects of waste management and must be combined with technological,
              economic, and social information to make effective decisions. An LCA of waste
              management can serve as either to support the development of a product LCA,
              or to investigate and evaluate waste management alternatives and strategies
              for decision making such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's solid
              waste management hierarchy (US EPA, 2012).
                Most communities know the cost and [to varying extents] local emissions
              associated with their waste management facilities, but few can capture the
              comprehensive picture of the true burdens and benefits that occur outside of
              their immediate region and infrastructure. LCA not only expands the bound-
              aries to consider a broader scope of environmental burdens but, and perhaps
              more importantly, captures benefits of materials and energy conservation
              and recovery. Table 11.1 provides a qualitative overview of the key life cycle
              burdens and benefits associated with waste management alternatives.
                For example, material recycling means less waste to be disposed of in a land-
              fill but also requires infrastructure and equipment for collection, processing
              and transportation. On the benefits side, material (paper, plastic, metal, glass)
              recycling avoids landfill-related impacts and creates beneficial offsets by virtue
              of displacing the use of virgin resources. Figure 11.1 illustrates the calculation
              of this beneficial offset for newsprint. The magnitude of the beneficial offset
              varies considerably by material. For example, metals recycling exhibits large
              offsets whereas glass has relatively smaller offsets (on a tonnage basis).
                Energy recovered from waste via waste-to-energy (WTE) and/or landfill
              gas-to-energy also creates beneficial offsets by virtue of displacing the use of
              fossil (and other) fuels to produce electrical energy in the utility sector. The
              magnitude for offsets varies by regional electricity grid mix and whether base
              load or average load is assumed to be displaced.


              11.3 LCA of Waste Management Versus GHG Inventory/
                      Reporting, Sustainability Reporting, and Other
                      Environmental Initiatives


              In general, an LCA takes a comprehensive global perspective regardless of
              where a particular operation is located or who has "ownership" of emissions.
   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268