Page 281 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition
P. 281

APPLICATION OF LCA IN MINING AND MINERALS PROCESSING          269

              chain (see [1]). However, more recent work has highlighted that the environ-
              mental impacts of the mining and minerals processing sectors are not always
              adequately reflected in LCA work (discussed later in this chapter). Further, if
              the life span of the product is adequately considered then the impacts associ-
              ated with the use phase dominate more often than not (e.g. electrical goods,
              cars, buildings). As a rule of thumb, short-life, disposable products are domi-
              nated by the production and manufacturing stages of the life cycle (aluminium
              foil), while energy consuming long-life products are dominated by the use
              phase (aluminium windows).
                A more detailed review shows the role that the functional unit, and ulti-
              mately the goal of the study, plays in defining the impact of different mate-
              rials and different life cycle stages on the total impact of the system. A case
              in point here is the difference between the environmental impact of produc-
              ing a brick, the environmental impact of producing a surface area of wall, the
              environmental impact of producing a house, and the environmental impact of
              providing a family with shelter. Ultimately the intention of LCA is to assess
              the environmental impact of a service or product, in this context the impact of
              the use phase can dominate. As the functional unit tends away from specific
              products and towards services, the impacts of production become diluted and
              the impacts of use begin to dominate.
                This leads to the realisation that, while environmentally intensive, mining and
              minerals processing typically do not represent the most significant impact stages
              of service or product life cycles. It was this misconception about the mining sec-
              tor which resulted in many companies not being prepared to supply informa-
              tion to LCI databases internationally Increasingly we are seeing companies being
              willing to supply more accurate information to LCI processes, however typically
              through industry associations and as industry average information, not on a com-
              pany by company basis (examples are Worldsteel/IISI, International Aluminium
              Institute, etc.). A classic example of a product where the use phase dominates is
              the role of bricks in a house. This is illustrated in Figure 12.1. Typical observa-
              tions on the impacts of different life cycle stages for different product types are
              included in Table 12.1. Details of the materials illustrated in this figure are:

                   • Metallic, long life: steel in construction, aluminium in cars and
                      construction, copper in white goods
                   • Metallic, short life: aluminium and steel in packaging
                   • Non-metallic, functional: construction materials
                   • Non-metallic, decorative: gem stones and precious stones
                   • Energy carriers: coal, oil, gas

                The mining and minerals industry has little influence on how, or sometimes
              even where, its products are used. International commodity exchanges repre-
              sent a disjunct in the value chain of materials - markets set prices making the
              industry price takers as opposed to price makers, and they enable buyers to be
              completely divorced from the producers of the raw material they are purchas-
              ing. Typically companies (virtually) aggregate their products and sell them on
   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286