Page 195 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition
P. 195

Sustainability of (H 2 ? CH 4 ) by Anaerobic Digestion          183

            3.2.3 Thermal Energy Loss
            The difference between the working temperature of the digester T w and the per-
            vading outdoor ambient temperature T a is responsible for the heat loss from the
            fermenting broth. The amount of energy lost should be supplied from such a
            temperature control system and it depends on the insulation of the fermenting
            broth, the surface area exposed to the ambient and the duration of the batch run.
            The energy loss per unit volume of reactor can be calculated as follows:
                                               ð
                             E l ¼ð4:5   k=s   DtT w Þ   DT=DÞ =g           ð6Þ
            where
                            -1
            k (Kcal h -1  m -1  °C )  is the thermal conductivity of the digester walls (e.g.,
                                 material such as concrete or steel, coupled with an
                                 insulator, polystyrene foam, is an example)
            s                    is the thickness of the reactor/insulating walls
            Dt (T w )            is the total duration of fermentation (h)
            DT = T w - T a       according to the season (°C)
            D                    is the diameter of reactor

              The resistance to heat transport is here only considered for the insulating
            material (k/s). This assumption leads to an overestimation of the insulator thick-
            ness for the same energy loss. Some explanations are given here about the above
            assumption. The heat flux from the bioreactor crosses three heat resistances in
            series. Therefore, the global thermal resistance U -1  is:

                                  U  1  ¼ 1=h i þ s=k þ 1=h e               ð7Þ
            where h i and h e are the internal and external convective heat transfers. A very thick
            insulator leads a higher resistance, due to a series of phenomena (Rohsenaw and
            Hartnett 1973) and both the convective coefficients, h i and h e can be disregarded; the
            situation graphically reported in Fig. 6 occurs, and hence, the controlling resistance
            will be that of the insulator, in terms of thickness s and heat conductivity k.


            Fig. 6 Assumption used for
            the evaluation of heat loss                  T w
            across bioreactor wall
                                                                          h e



                                                          h i

                                                                           T a

                                                                   s
   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200