Page 222 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition
P. 222

Comparing Various Indicators
            for the LCA of Residential Photovoltaic
            Systems



            Ruben Laleman, Johan Albrecht and Jo Dewulf






            Abstract This chapter presents a broad environmental evaluation of residential
            Photovoltaic (PV) systems. It focuses mainly on how variations in irradiation
            levels, assessment methodology, and the lifetime of the solar panel influence the
            perception regarding its sustainability. Data from the Ecoinvent Life-Cycle
            Assessment (LCA) database and the literature were used and various Life-Cycle
            Impact Assessment (LCIA) methods were considered for six different PV types.
            The results indicate that variations in irradiation levels, methodology and lifetime
            can significantly influence the final results and conclusions of a LCA. By carefully
            selecting assumptions and methodology, one can clearly influence the perceived
            environmental impact of PV systems. In addition, we state that multidimensional
            indicators should be used along with the one-dimensional ones. Also, the choice of
            the perspective (Hierarchist, Egalitarian or Individualist) has a major impact on the
            final results. In our opinion, the current focus on Greenhouse Gas (GHG)-emis-
            sions and energy efficiency ignores important environmental impact dimensions
            such as resource depletion.












            R. Laleman (&)   J. Albrecht
            Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University,
            Tweekerkenstraat 2, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
            e-mail: Ruben.laleman@ugent.be
            J. Albrecht
            e-mail: Johan.albrecht@ugent.be
            J. Dewulf
            Research Group ENVOC, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
            e-mail: Jo.dewulf@ugent.be


            A. Singh et al. (eds.), Life Cycle Assessment of Renewable Energy Sources,  211
            Green Energy and Technology, DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-5364-1_10,
            Ó Springer-Verlag London 2013
   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227