Page 61 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition

56 3. Life cycle thinking tools: Life cycle assessment, life cycle costing and social life cycle assessment

Ramasamy, S.V., Titchener-Hooker, N., Lettieri, P., 2015. Life cycle assessment as a tool to support decision making in
the biopharmaceutical industry: considerations and challenges. Food Bioprod. Process. 94, 297–305.
Reidy, R., Davis, M., Coony, R., Gould, S., Mann, C., Sewak, B., 2015. Guidelines For Life Cycle Cost Analysis, Land
and Buildings. Stanford University, available at https://lbre.stanford.edu/sites/all/lbre-shared/files/docs_
public/LCCA121405.pdf. (Accessed 14 February 2019).
Rocchi, L., Kadzinski, M., Menconi, M.E., Grohmann, D., Miebs, G., Paolotti, L., Boggia, A., 2018. Sustainability eval-
uation of retrofitting solutions for rural buildings through life cycle approach and multi-criteria analysis. Energy
Build. 173, 281–290.
Russo Garrido, S., Beaulieu, L., Telles do Carmo, B.B., 2018. The social value of products: what can it be and can it
enrich social life cycle assessment? In: Social LCA People and Places for Partnership 6th SocSem Pre-proceeding,
Fruitop Thema, Pescara. ISBN: 978-2-9562141-1-3, pp. 43–46.
Sala, S., Vasta, A., Mancini, L., Dewulf, J., Rosenbaum, E., 2015. Social Life Cycle Assessment—State of the Art and
Challenges for Supporting Product Policies. EUR 27624 EN. https://doi.org/10.2788/253715 ISBN 978-92-79-
54054-7 (print); ISBN 978-92-79-54055-4 (PDF).
Santos, P., Carvalho Pereira, A., Gerva ´sio, H., Battencourt, A., Mateus, D., 2017. Assessment of health and comfort
criteria in a life cycle social context: Application to buildings for higher education. Build. Environ. 123, 625–648.
Schmidt, M., Crawford, R.H., 2017. Developing an integrated framework for assessing the life cycle greenhouse gas
emissions and life cycle cost of buildings. Procedia Eng. 196, 988–995.
SETAC, 1993. Guidelines for Life—Cycle Assessment: A ’Code of Practice’. SETAC, Brussels.
Soltanpour, Y., Peri, I., Temri, L., 2018. Discussing features of social measures important in SLCA impact indicators’
selection. In: Social LCA People and Places for Partnership 6th SocSem Pre-Proceeding, Fruitop Thema, Pescara.
ISBN: 978-2-9562141-1-3, pp. 52–56.
Tillman, A.M., Baumann, H., 2004. The Hitch Hiker’s Guide to LCA. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund, Sweden.
Toniolo, S., Mazzi, A., Pieretto, C., Scipioni, A., 2017a. Allocation strategies in comparative life cycle assessment for
recycling: considerations from case studies. Resour. Conserv. Recy. 117, 249–261.
Toniolo, S., Mazzi, A., Fedele, A., Aguiari, F., Scipioni, A., 2017b. Life cycle assessment to support the quantification of
the environmental impacts of an event. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 63, 12–22.
Trevisani Juchen, R., Bonacina de Araujo, J., Chabrawi, A.M.R.O., Ugaya, C.M., 2018. Preliminary evaluation of data
collection methods for SLCA studies. In: Social LCA People and Places for Partnership 6th SocSem Pre-
proceeding, Fruitop Thema, Pescara. ISBN: 978-2-9562141-1-3, pp. 22–27.
UNEP/SETAC, 2009. Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products. United Nations Environment
Programme. ISBN: 978-92-807-3021-0. DTI/1164/PA.
Vasta, A., Sala, S., Dewulf, J., 2015. Application of S-LCA at micro and macro scale: an overview. In: Sala, S., Vasta, A.,
Mancini, L., Dewulf, J., Rosenbaum, E. (Eds.), Social Life Cycle Assessment—State of the Art and Challenges for
Supporting Product Policies. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxemburg, pp. 31–38. European Com-
mission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Woodward, D.G., 1997. Life cycle costing-theory, information acquisition and application. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 15 (6),
335–344.
Xue, X., Cashman, S., Gaglione, A., Mosley, J., Weiss, L., Ma, X.C., Cashdollar, J., Garland, J., 2019. Holistic analysis of
urban water systems in the greater Cincinnati region: (1) life cycle assessment and cost implications. Water Res. X.
100015.
Zanghelini, G.M., Cherubini, E., Soares, S.R., 2018. How multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) is aiding life cycle
assessment (LCA) in results interpretation. J. Clean. Prod. 172, 609–622.