Page 94 - Literacy in the New Media Age
P. 94

6
                       A SOCIAL THEORY OF TEXT
                                         Genre












                     Genre in theorising about literacy: some introductory
                                         remarks
            In Chapter 4 I discussed some theoretical concepts we need in order to provide a
            full  account  of  literacy.  I  said  that  text  as  the  product  of  social  action  was  the
            starting  point.  However,  we  need  categories  that  will  help  us  understand  what
            text is, how it is constituted and, above all, what text does. Again, the starting
            point  is  social  action.  Who  acts,  with  what  purposes  and  around  what  issues?
            Clearly, in social action there are issues; they may be exceedingly trivial, or they
            may be significant. Issues are one reason for action. Where there are no issues,
            there  is  no  action.  In  earlier  formulations  (1984/1989)  I  used  the  notion  of
            difference  to  explain  the  coming  into  being  of  text;  difference  not  in  the  sense
            that  Derrida  has  used  it  but  in  the  sense  in  which  we  explain  lightning:  a
            potential for a current to flow due to a difference in electrical charge. The current
            is made possible by that difference, with a flow from negative charge to positive
            charge. In semiosis that difference can be about anything: about who is to act,
            about purposes, about knowledge, about issues of any kind. Difference as such is
            itself  an  issue.  In  this  book  I  want  to  use  issue  to  refer  to  content,  to  what
            something is about. In the social semiotic theory that I use, this is dealt with by
            the  category  of  discourse.  It  deals  with  the  social  provenance,  production  and
            organisation of content, following from the work of Michel Foucault.
              Genre, by contrast, deals not with what is talked about, what is represented in
            the sense of what issues, but with who acts (and) in relation to whom, with the
            question  of  purposes.  This  is  directly  in  the  domain  of  social  interaction:  the
            questions that arise are questions such as ‘who are the participants involved in
            the social action as it takes place?’ and ‘what are their social relations with each
            other?’  Such  interactions  have  structure  and  shape,  which  is  reflected  in  or
            realised in the representational practices that are part of such actions, or which
            constitute  such  actions.  When  that  social  action  is  looked  at  from  the  point  of
            view of representation, we invoke the category of text. Text is the result of the
            social  semiotic  action  of  representation.  We  say  that  a  text  was  produced.
   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99