Page 122 - Macromolecular Crystallography
P. 122

MOLECULAR REPLACEMENT TECHNIQUES  111


          Protocol 7.6 Full 6D search with the phased translation function

          1. Determine the asymmetric unit of the space group of the  The resulting formatted file will be fed to AMoRe as m1.rts,
          rotation function of your space group (Urzhumtsev and  the input file to Phased Translation Function (PTF).
          Urzhumtseva, 2002).                       3. Run AMoRe PTF in all the possible space groups (see
          2. Write and execute jiffy code to create the (formatted)  Protocol 7.1), after having run a test case (as in
          input file to explore exhaustively rotation space:  Protocol 7.2).
          c...                                      4. Use perl to extract the information on the solutions with
           delta0 = 5.                               the highest score from the (enormous) log file. Sort the
           delta1 = delta0/2.                        solutions.
           doi= −imax,imax                          5. Plot results using gnuplot.
             do j = 0,jmax
                 dok= −kmax, kmax
                      alpha = alpha0 + delta0*i
                      beta = beta0 + delta1*j
                      gamma = gamma0 + delta0*k
                      write(2,’(3f10.5,4x,2f11.3,i10)’)alpha,beta,gamma,r,t,iu
                 enddo
             enddo
           enddo
          c...






        the authors can keep track of both the successes  normally using the best combination of weighted
        and failures of jobs submitted by the crystallo-  model(s) identified in this way.
        graphic community and use these as bench marks
        and opportunities to improve their protocols. So
                                                     Acknowledgments
        their performances should keep growing, provided
        that crystallographers don’t shy away from them  We gratefully acknowledge financial support from
        because of confidentiality problems.          ACI-IMPB045 from the Ministere de la Recherche
          Finally, by way of setting perspectives, we wish to  et de la Technologie and from GDR 2417 du CNRS.
        point out that the only alternative to the use of many  We thank G. Labesse (CBS, CNRS, Montpellier)
        different models successively, with the same proto-  for discussions and communication of results prior
        col, until one of them gives a better signal, would  to publication and P. Dumas (IBMC, CNRS, Stras-
        be to use all of them simultaneously, weighted by  bourg) for comments on the manuscript.
        some linear prefactor that remains to be determined.
        The sum of all these prefactors for all the different  References
        copies of the model should of course be 1. This is
        actually reminiscent of some recent approaches to  Adams, P., Pannu, N. S., Read, R. J., and Brünger, A. T.
                                                      (1999) Extending the limits of molecular replace-
        the refinement of macromolecules using a multicopy
                                                      ment through combined simulated annealing and
        strategy, so as to take into account some inherent
                                                      maximum-likelihood refinement. Acta Crystallogr. D 55,
        flexibility of the model (Burling and Brünger, 1994;
                                                      181–190.
        Pellegrini et al., 1997). We suggest that refining the  Altschul, S. F, Madden, T. L., Schaffer, A. A., Zhang, J.,
        weights of the different models at each orientation  Zhang, Z., Miller, W., and Lipman, D. J. (1997)
        of the model in the rotation function should improve  Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of
        the signal-to-noise ratio of the whole procedure.  protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25,
        Translation function searches should then proceed  3389–3402.
   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127