Page 175 - Macromolecular Crystallography
P. 175

164  MACROMOLECULAR CRYS TALLOGRAPHY

        atoms are initially simply diffracting balls of density  overlapping occupancies, etc.), its power for lower
        without necessarily having a meaningful chemical  resolution should not be underestimated.
        identity or connectivity.
          One of the most popular refinement programs  11.3.2 Automation in model building
        is the state-of-the-art package Refmac (Murshudov
        et al., 1997). Refmac uses atomic parameters (xyz,  To review all existing model building concepts
        B, occ) but also offers optimization of TLS and  and programs is beyond the scope of this chapter.
        anisotropic displacement parameters. The objective  Instead, a small, selected number of key ideas and
        function is a maximum likelihood derived residual  methods will be mentioned. The current software
        that is available for structure factor amplitudes but  packages have anyway much in common so pro-
        can also include experimental phase information.  grams that are not described here should neverthe-
        Refmac boasts a sparse-matrix approximation to the  less be comprehensible with minimal extrapolation.
        normal matrix and also full matrix calculation. The  Intuitively, the approaches generally try to mimic
        program is extremely fast, very robust, and is cap-  what an experienced crystallographer would do.
        able of delivering excellent results over a wide range  Therefore, many of the methods follow the algo-
        of resolutions.                              rithms originally employed in molecular-graphics
          Another highly popular package is CNS (Brunger  packages such as O (Jones et al., 1991) or QUANTA
        et al., 1998). It offers a wide range of capabilities  (Accelrys Inc.) to aid the manual model building
        common to other packages and also includes torsion  process. All techniques that address automation
        angle refinement, which is particularly powerful  in macromolecular model building are, to a larger
        and useful in the low resolution regime. CNS also  or smaller extent, based on the pattern-recognition
        uses likelihood targets and the restraints are for-  aspect in the interpretation of crystallographic
        mulated via energy functions and force fields. CNS  electron density map.
        employs a conjugate-gradient based optimizer com-  Apopularmethodtorepresentanelectron-density
        bined with simulated annealing. XPLOR (Brunger,  distribution in a way that captures the connectiv-
        1993) and its commercial reincarnations are based on  ity of the map was skeletonization, proposed back in
        similar principles. The PHENIX (Adams et al., 2002)  1974 (Greer, 1974) but put into practice by Jones and
        package, which encompasses a dedicated refine-  coworkers in the late 1980s (Jones and Thirup, 1986).
        ment module, follows some of the CNS ideas but  It is a simple and elegant way to reduce an often
        uses other, very advanced minimizers.        cluttered 3D electron density map to a set of lines
          BUSTER/TNT (Bricogne and Irvin, 1996) is   that capture the essential chemistry (connectivity)
        another likelihood based refinement package that  of the map. The method is an iterative procedure
        excels especially in cases in which the model is  that removes points from a grid representation of the
        still severely incomplete (Blanc et al., 2004; Tronrud  electron density map as long as this does not break
        et al., 1987). It uses atomic parameters but also has  their connectivity. A small set of grid points remains
        a novel solvent and missing model envelope func-  that can be used to produce a skeleton of the original
        tion. The optimization method is a preconditioned  density. Despite more sophisticated developments,
        conjugate gradient as implemented in the TNT pack-  skeletonization remains a powerful and commonly
        age (Tronrud et al., 1987) that had a faithful audience  employed method and is perhaps still the most
        in the pre-likelihood era.                   widely employed technique for computer-assisted
          SHELXL (Sheldrick and Schneider, 1997) is often  manual macromolecular model building in experi-
        viewed as a refinement program for high-resolution  mental electron density maps. Related approaches
        data only. Although it undoubtedly offers features  that make use of electron density extremes include
        needed for that resolution regime (optimization of  the core-tracing algorithm (Swanson, 1994) and
        anisotropic temperature factors, occupancy refine-  molecular scene analysis (Fortier et al., 1997).
        ment, full matrix least squares to obtain standard  The idea of ESSENS (Kleywegt and Jones, 1997) is
        deviations from the inverse Hessian matrix, flexi-  to recognize secondary structural templates around
        ble definitions for NCS, easiness to describe partially  each point in the map by an exhaustive search. This
   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180