Page 190 - Macromolecular Crystallography
P. 190

HIGH-THROUGHPUT DATA COLLECTION AT SYNCHROTRONS  179

        crystals (i.e. <50 µm in diameter) make sample  Non-X-ray signatures from crystals can also be
        positioning akin to threading a needle. For larger  used for detection/centring. Ultraviolet fluores-
        sized beams, such as those found with home sources  cence from the aromatic residues in the polypeptide
        or at older synchrotrons, or crystals with greater  chain can indicate the position of the crystal within
        dimensions, this process can be considerably easier.  the mount. Recent work has utilized high inten-
          With appropriate crystal lighting and video-based  sity UV lasers for fluorescence excitation (Vernede
        visualization optics, it is usually possible for an end  et al., 2006). Differential transmission and reflection
        user to locate the crystal within the nylon loop and  of infrared radiation from the crystal, relative to that
        position it in the X-ray beam. At present, automa-  of the loop and the surrounding cryoprotectant, has
        tion of this process does entail some compromise.  also been used to detect crystals within nylon loops
        With current technology, it is considerably easier to  (Snell et al., 2005). The success of this latter tech-
        identify the centre of a quasicircular nylon loop than  nique at a synchrotron beamline is not yet at the
        to recognize a protein crystal, particularly because  level achieved in the developmental laboratory. One
        individual crystals can vary greatly in both shape  of these methods may ultimately become a stan-
        and size. Centring based on detection of the loop,  dard means for detecting protein crystals directly.
        however, will place the crystalline sample in the  Currently, however, control of the location of the
        X-ray beam only if the diameter of the loop is com-  crystal within a commensurate loop prior to cryo-
        mensurate with that of the crystal or the beam. This  genic preservation in liquid nitrogen, followed by
        centring method, therefore, requires upstream con-  positioning of the loop, represents the most reli-
        trol of how crystals are mounted, ensuring that the  able method for rapid, accurate placement of protein
        loop and the crystal are matched in size and that the  crystals in X-ray beams at synchrotron sources.
        crystal is placed at or near the centre of the loop. Illu-
        mination of the loop and visualization optics have a  12.3.5 Removal of surface ice
        significant impact on automated recognition of the
        crystal mount. The lighting strategy must provide  It is common for liquid nitrogen frozen protein crys-
        sufficient contrast between the loop and the back-  tals to acquire a patina of ice on the surface of
        ground of the video image and minimize glare from  the cryoprotectant. Diffraction of X-rays from even
        the surfaces of cryogenically frozen samples. Sub-  small ice crystals can mask reflections from the pro-
        optimal lighting can obscure the boundaries of the  tein crystal. In addition, the presence of excessive
        loop and compromise the effectiveness of automated  amounts of ice can obscure the true position of the
        detection algorithms.                        nylon loop, thereby resulting in the failure to place
          For high-throughput data collection, sample cen-  thecrystalintheX-raybeam. Itis, therefore, essential
        tring via loop detection is currently the method of  to remove ice crystals prior to diffraction analysis.
        choice for placing crystals in the X-ray beam. Alter-  Traditionally, crystallographers have manually
        native methods rely on the direct detection of the  removed ice by either pouring a small amount of liq-
        crystal itself by monitoring the intensity of either  uid nitrogen over the crystal or by gently abrading
        X-ray diffraction from the crystal or X-ray fluores-  the surface with an implement such as a single paint
        cence from an element in the crystal that is not  brush bristle. The Stanford Auto-mounting System
        present in the cryoprotectant (Pohl et al., 2004). Both  provides for removal of a sample from the goniostat
        of these approaches have drawbacks. First, some of  and rapid ‘washing’ within a bath of liquid nitrogen
        the limited X-ray lifetime of the crystal (Section 12.6)  to eliminate ice (Cohen et al., 2005).
        must be committed to detection instead of data col-  SGX-CAT uses a unique system based on a small
        lection. Second, the loop itself has to be placed close  liquid nitrogen pump for a similar purpose. The
        to the X-ray beam prior to crystal detection, followed  pump controls delivery of a gentle stream of liquid
        by step-wise translation of the crystal through the  nitrogen that is directed onto the surface of the sam-
        beam, thereby increasing the time required to centre  ple after it has been positioned within the gaseous
        the sample.                                  cryostream by the sample-changing robot. A phase
   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195