Page 51 - Make Work Great
P. 51

It Starts with You

                     Quick Video: Say No Without Saying No

                     Visit www.MakeWorkGreat.com for a short video segment about
                     how to construct and use a verbalized summary outputs list (VSO) as a
                     statement of your workplace purpose. Note that the video employs the
                     term “verbalized summary objectives” instead of “verbalized summary
                     outputs,” but both the acronym and the intent are exactly the same.
                     This is an easy bit of information to share if you’re trying to describe
                     the contents of this chapter to a trusted friend or colleague.





                  to be producing, whether directly or through others. Both capture the
                  elements of the writer’s workplace purpose in order of priority and his
                  or her division of resources in appropriate terms. Finally, both have
                  a level of detail that allows them to be meaningful to, memorable to,
                  and easily verbalized by the owner.
                    That’s why in the example no mention is made of revenue or
                  fi nancial return. Summary outputs lists are written in the terms most
                  meaningful to the one doing the work, not to the company. Financial
                  fi gures are appropriate in lists owned by those at the executive level
                  and by salespeople at all levels, because in those cases fi nancial results
                  are the measure of their output. In most other areas of responsibility it
                  is far preferable to avoid fi nancial fi gures altogether and instead focus
                  upon the real measurable outcomes that ultimately lead to them.
                    Notice also what is absent. First, neither list contains any information
                  about how the work gets done. There is no mention of time spent talking
                  on the phone, checking e-mail, or traveling. The focus is only on what
                  output is needed. Second, both lists omit some of what their owners do.
                  In reality, an endless supply of “additional tasks” lands in everyone’s lap.
                  These tangential, potentially distracting jobs are purposely left out to
                  keep the focus on the critical few. Finally, notice that neither list wastes
                  words with contingencies for “if things change.” To be sure, things will

                  change. When they do, the lists change to reflect them, and the before-




                                                 40
   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56