Page 159 - Managing Change in Organizations
P. 159

CarnCh08v3.qxd  3/30/07  4:24 PM  Page 142







                   Chapter 8  ■ Sustaining organizational effectiveness

                       CASE
                      STUDY       International Engineering


                                  This company engages in engineering design, consultancy and project management
                                  work worldwide. It is wholly owned by a US-based multinational. It employs 2000 peo-
                                  ple, of which 1500 are based in the UK, 1000 in central London. This company had
                                  enjoyed almost a monopoly position in the 1950s and 1960s and then had benefited
                                  from the rapid growth of North Sea oil exploration engineering work in the 1970s. The
                                  1980s had brought growing competition and a declining market in the North Sea.
                                  Growing markets required new technology. Overall the company was structured in a rel-
                                  atively ad hoc way. Within the engineering departments, and within specific projects, the
                                  company was structured as a professional bureaucracy. By the early 1990s the board was
                                  concerned that it was losing competitive edge and therefore being unsuccessful in any
                                  important bids for new business.
                                    To develop a more adaptive organization, various main threads of organizational
                                  change were needed. First, the organization needed to be structured to achieve clearer
                                  accountability. Various measures were required, as can be seen from Figures 8.6, 8.7 and
                                  8.8. The establishment of business units at regional level was designed to strengthen
                                  general management, improve efficiency and focus effort to meet market needs.
                                  Organizational changes aimed at elevating the role of projects, engineering and mar-
                                  keting were designed to improve coordination, strengthen operations/project manage-
                                  ment and improve efficiency. Under the old structure, too much depended on the
                                  operations director. The changes created a more balanced allocation of responsibility
                                  and authority between the various functions. The business unit approach involved the
                                  adoption of market mechanisms. For accountability, each general manager was to be
                                  responsible for profit, and was to be left to be relatively autonomous, as long as profit
                                  and market objectives were attained. It was intended that business units buy in services
                                  from both group and other business units, or from elsewhere, thus strengthening the
                                  market approach.



                                                            Chairman

                                       Finance   Personnel   Operations   Legal    On-shore   Off-shore
                                       director  manager     director              director    director
                                                                                   Marketing    Sales
                                                                                   and sales



                                  Southern   Northern   Scottish     International   Director of   Director of
                                   region    region     region        engineering   engineering   projects
                                                                        India
                                                                 US
                                                             engineering
                                  Figure 8.6  Corporate structure, Pre-change




                   142
   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164