Page 185 -
P. 185

174    MANAGING KNOWLEDGE WORK AND INNOVATION

                            These features help to explain why even writers who are more positive about
                          managed communities believe that they can only be successful if managers find
                          new ways of managing. Wenger (1998), for example, argues that managed com-
                          munities can only succeed if managers limit their tendency towards controlling
                          activities. Managed communities need to be cultivated rather than controlled.
                          Such cultivation might involve a number of activities, including public events
                          such as ‘knowledge fairs’ that bring the community together; multiple forms of
                          leadership, including ‘thought leaders’, networkers and people who document
                          practice; inter-community learning projects; and the creation and dissemination
                          of artefacts such as documents, tools, stories, websites and so on.
                            Cultivation is not without cost. Not only does it require investment in new IT
                          systems and event organization, but it may also involve the creation of new spe-
                          cialist roles. This was demonstrated in the Buckman Labs case described in the
                          HRM chapter where the company developed what were in effect managed com-
                          munities. These were based on underlying communities that emerged around
                          the online problem-solving forums created by the K’Netix system.
                            As these informal networks of specialists evolved, and their value to the
                          company became apparent, Buckman sought to cultivate them by providing
                          additional resources, including specialist support roles. Thus the role of ‘forum
                          specialist’ was created to maintain and update the community knowledge base.
                          If a request to the community went unattended for a few hours, for example,
                          the forum specialist would pick up the request, identify the potential experts
                          and informally forward it to them for attention. Another, more formal, route
                          involved bringing in ‘section leaders’ – that is, a group of experts who have
                          volunteered to tackle some of the more stubborn problems in particular areas.
                          These different specialists enabled the free flow of discussions on the company’s
                          problem-solving forums to be captured and recycled for future use. For exam-
                          ple, when a particular topic was considered ‘dead’ or finally resolved, forum
                          specialists and section leaders would process it further, validating and verifying it
                          before it was uploaded into the knowledge base to be ready for distribution and
                          reuse (Buckman, 1998).






























                                                                                             6/5/09   7:19:35 AM
                  9780230_522015_09_cha08.indd   174                                         6/5/09   7:19:35 AM
                  9780230_522015_09_cha08.indd   174
   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190