Page 139 - Marine Structural Design
P. 139

Chapter 6 Offshore Structural Analysis                                 115

                  The finite element model for analysis of jackets includes:
                  (2) Loads:  The loads include:
                     Functional loads such as gravity load
                     Environmental loads due to wind, waves, currents, earthquakes, and
                     Accidental loads that may occur during its service life.
                  The  increase  in  hydrodynamic and  gravity  actions  caused  by  marine  growth  should be
                  accounted for. The hydrodynamic model of the structure should include appurtenances such as
                  conductors, I-tubes and  risers, caisson, ladders and  stairs, launch box, boat landing, guides,
                  and anodes. Depending upon the type and number, appurtenances can significantly increase
                  the global wave forces. In addition, forces on some appurtenances may be important for local
                  member design. Appurtenances not welded to the main  structure are generally modeled as
                  non-structural members that only contribute as equivalent wave forces.
                  (2)  Foundation: The foundation system for the jacket temporary on-bottom condition prior to
                  installation of the permanent foundation system should be documented to have the required
                  foundation stability for the specified environmental conditions, and for all relevant limit-states.
                  Throughout  the  analysis,  structure-to-ground  connections  should  be  selected  in  order  to
                  represent the  response of  the  foundations.  They  may  normally be  simulated using  linear
                  stiffness matrices. The finite element analysis may model behavior of axial and lateral soil-
                  foundation systems explicitly.
                  (3)  Structures:  The stiffkess of the  deck structure shall be  modeled in  suficient  detail to
                  ensure  compatibility between  the  deck  design  and  the jacket  design. In  a  linear analysis
                  normally it is sufficient to model one member using only one element. However, in order to
                  account for member buckling and local dynamic response, one or more beam-column elements
                  are required to model  each member depending on the  element  formulation, distribution of
                  actions. Major eccentricities of load carrying members may be modeled as rigid ends in the
                  model.
                  Modeling for Ultimate Strength Analysis
                  The load cases include each mode of operation, such as drilling, production, work-over, or a
                  combination thereof.  According  to  NTS  (1998),  it  is  necessary  to  perform  analyses  to
                  establish:
                     maximum base shear of wave and current actions for dimensioning jacket bracing's,
                     maximum overturning moments for dimensioning jacket legs and foundation systems.
                     maximum  local  member  forces  which  may  occur for  wave  positions  other  than  that
                     causing the maximum global force.
                  Modeling for Fatigue Analysis
                  Fatigue analysis should include all relevant actions contributing to the fatigue damage both in
                  non-operational and in operational design conditions. When calculating fatigue damage, local
                  action effects due to wave slamming and vortex shedding should be included if relevant.
                  While jackets  in  shallow water  depths  are normally insensitive to  dynamic effects, non-
                  linearity's  associated  with  wave  theory  and  free-surface  effects  may  be  important.  A
                  deterministic analysis is normally recommended for such jackets. For deepwater jackets where
                  the  dynamic effects  are  important, a  fatigue  analysis in  the  frequency domain  (dynamic
   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144