Page 276 - Marine Structural Design
P. 276

252                                                    Part II Ultimate Strength


                 used,  for the ultimate strength analysis of ship hulls by Paik (1991).  This method leads to a
                 considerable reduction  in  the  size  of  the  mathematical  model.  Furthermore,  Valsgm  &
                 Pettersen  (1982)  and  ValsgSud  &  Steen  (1991)  developed  a  non-linear  super-element
                 procedure, which can also model a complicated structure using only a few elements. So far the
                 ISUM  method  has  not  been  applied  to  dynamic  response  analysis  because  geometrical
                 nonlinearities have been  accounted  for using  empirical  equations. It  is  difficult to  derive
                 empirical equations for dynamic geometrically nonlinear analysis.
                 With regards to collision damages to ship hulls, there is an increasing international concern for
                 oil pollution from tankers due to different degrees of collision damage. Very little research has
                 been done on minor ship collisions, as opposed to the extensive investigations in the seventies,
                 which related  to  major  collisions involving nuclear vessels.  McDermott et  a1  (1974)  and
                 Kinkead (1980)  presented simplified methods for analyzing local deformations of the struck
                 ships in minor collisions. Van Mater et aZ(1979)  reviewed low-energy ship collision damage
                 theories and design methodologies. It0 et  a1  (1984)  conducted systematic large-scale static
                 tests and presented an excellent simplified method, which was used to analyze the strength of
                  double-hulled structures in collision.
                  The purpose of this chapter is to develop a procedure to enable the calculation of the ultimate
                 hull girder strength, which is as accurate as Smith’s method (1977)  is for pure bending. It is
                 based  on  a FEM  approach, and the procedure may save manpower and  computer CPU  as
                 much  as the  ISUM  and  the  super-element  approach  can  do.  Combining the  plastic  node
                  method  (PNM) with  the general FEM  approach for geometrically nonlinear problems, the
                 present PNM approach may be applied to dynamic geometrical and material nonlinear analysis
                  that is useful for both ultimate strength and impact response analysis.
                  This Chapter first presents an accurate and efficient finite element procedure for the static and
                  dynamic collapse analyses of ship hulls. This procedure accounts for geometric and material
                  nonlinearities by combining elastic, large displacement analysis theories with a plastic hinge
                  model. A set of finite elements such as beam-column,  stiffened plate,  and shear panel are
                  developed.  Secondly,  mathematical equations for  the  estimation of  ultimate moment  and
                  moments interaction are then  presented  and  discussed. Thirdly, the Smith method  for hull
                  girder analysis is modified to account for the effect of corrosion defects and fatigue cracks.
                  These equations and analysis methods are then compared through ultimate strength analysis of
                  a  couple  of  ship  hull  girders.  Finally,  practical  applications to  the  ultimate  longitudinal
                  strength analysis of ship hulls and response analysis of tankers involved in collisions are also
                 demonstrated.
                 This Chapter is based on Bai, Bendiksen and Pedersen (1993) and Sun and Bai (2001).


                  13.2  Hull Structural Analysis Based on the Plastic Node Method
                 The  finite element formulation for the  collapse analysis of  ship hulls is described  in  the
                  following sections. The analysis is based on a standard beam-column analysis. This involves
                  formulations for the collapse of plates and  stiffened plates,  shear panel elements, and non-
                  linear spring elements.
                  13.2.1  Beam-Column Element
                 Figure 13.1 shows a three-dimensional beam-column element. It is a prismatic Timoshenko
                 beam, which has an arbitrary cross-sectional shape. An updated Lagrangian approach has been
   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281