Page 368 - Marine Structural Design
P. 368

344                                                  Part 111 Fatigue and Fracture

                 Since the fillet weld is going out of the edge of the plate, S-N curve G should be used with
                 m=3.0, log;  = 11.39, this gives the following damage ratio:






                 17.5  References
                 1.   MSHTO (1989), “Standard Specifcation for Highway Bridges, 14th Ed.”, American
                      Association of State Highway Transportation Officials, Washington D.C.
                 2.   ABS (1992), “Guide for the Fatigue Strength Assessment of Tankers”. In ABS Steel
                      Vessel Rules (latest revision), American Bureau of Shipping.
                 3.   Almar-Naess,  A.  (1 985),  “Fatigue Handbook,  Ofshore  Steel  Structures”, Tapir,
                      Norway.
                 4.   API RP2A-WSD  (2001),  “Planning,  Designing  and  Constructing Fixed  Offshore
                      Platforms  - Working Stress Design”.
                 5.   AWS D 1.1 (1 992), “Structural Welding Code - Steel”, American Welding Society.
                 6.   BS 5400 (1 979), “Steel, Concrete and Composite Bridges, Part IO,  Codes of Practice
                      for Fatigue”,  British Standard Institute.
                 7.   BS 8 11 8 (1991), “Stvuctural Use of Aluminum”, British Standard Institute.
                 8.   BS  7608  (1993),  “Code  of  Practice for  Fatigue  Design  and  Assessment of  Steel
                      Structures”,  British Standard Institute.
                 9.   BS  7910  (2001),  “Guide on  Methods for Assessing the  Acceptability of Flaws  in
                      Structures”,  British Standard Institute.
                 10.   BV (1998), “Fatigue Strength of Welded Ship Structures”, Bureau Veritas.
                 11.   DNV (2000), “RP-C203, Fatigue Strength Analysis of Offshore Steel Structures”, Det
                      Norske Veritas.
                 12.   ECCS (1 992), “European Recommendations for Aluminum Alloy Structures: Fatigue
                      Design  ”, ECCS  Report  No.  68,  Brussels,  Belgium,  European  Convention  for
                      Structural Steelwork.
                 13.   Eurocode 3 (1993), “Design of Steel Structures”, European Standards.
                 14.   Efthymiou, M.  (1 988), “Development of  SCF Formulae  and  Generalized Influence
                      Functions for Use  in  Fatigue Analysis”, Offshore Tubular Joints Conference  OTJ,
                      Egham, Surrey, U. K.
                 15.   Fricke,  W.  (2002),  “Recommended  Hot-Spot  Analysis  Procedures  for  Structural
                      Details of Ships and FPSOs Based on Round-Robin FE Analysis”, Journal of ISOPE,
                      Vol. 12(1), pp. 40-47.
                 16.   Fricke, W.,  Berge, S., Brennan, F., Cui, W., Josefson, L., Kierkegaard, H., Kihl, D.,
                      Koval, M.,  Mikkola, T.P.,  Parmentier, G., Toyosada, M., Yoon, J.H.,  (2000), “Fatigue
                      and Fracture”, Committee report of ISSC (Int. Ship and Offshore Structures Congress),
                      Nagasaki, Japan.
   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373