Page 395 - Marine Structural Design
P. 395

Chapter 19 Simplified Fatigue Assesment                                371

                  19.8  References

                  1.   ABS  (ZOOO),  “Guide  for  Building  and  Classing Floating  Production  Installations”,
                       American Bureau of Shipping.
                  2.   ABS  (2002),  “Rule  for  Building  and  Classing Steel Vessels”,  American  Bureau  of
                       Shipping.
                  3.   Almar-Naess, A. (1985), “Fatigue Handbook, Offshore Steel Structures”, Tapir, Norway.
                  4.   API  (2001),  “Recommendations  for  Planning,  Designing  and  Constructing  Fixed
                       Offshore Platforms”, API Recommended Practice 2A (RP 2A), 2 1st Edition, American
                       Petroleum Institute.
                  5.   Bea,  R.  G.,  Cramer,  E.,  Schulte-Strauthaus, R.,  Mayoss,  R.,  Gallion,  K.,  Ma,  K.T.,
                       Holzman,  R.  and  Demsetz,  L.  (1995),  “Ship’s  Maintenance Project”,  Conducted  at
                       University of  California, Berkeley for  U.S. Coast  Guard/Ship  Structure Committee
                       (SSC), SSC-386.
                  6.   BV (1998), “Fatigue Strength of Welded Ship Structures I’, Bureau Veritas.
                  7.   Cheung, M.C. & Slaughter, S.B. (1998), “Inner Bottom Design Problems in Double-Hull
                       Tankers”, Marine Technology, April.
                  8.   Clauss, G.,  Lehmann, E.  and  Ostergaard, C.  (1994), “Offshore Structures,  Vol. I. -
                       Strength and Safety for Structural Design”, Springer-Verlag.
                  9.   DNV (2000), “RP-(2203,  Fatigue Strength Analysis of Offshore Steel Structures”, Det
                       Norske Veritas.
                  10.  Glasfeld, R.,  Jordan, D.,  Kerr, M.,  and Zoller, D.  (1977), “Review of Ship Structural
                       Details”, Ship Structure Committee  Report SSC-226.
                  11.  IACS (1994): “Bulk Carriers - Guidelines for Surveys, Assessment and Repair of Hull
                       Structure”, International Association of Classification Societies.
                  12.  Luyties, W.H. and Stoebner, A.M. (1998), “The Use of API Simplified Fatigue Design
                      Methodology for Gulf of Mexico Structures”, OTC 8823.
                  13.  Ma,  K.T.  (1998), “Tanker  Inspection  and  a  Risk-Based  Approach”,  Proceedings of
                      ISOPE98, International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Montreal.
                  14.  Ma, K.T., Srinivasan, S., Zhang, H., Healy, B. and Peng, H. (2000), “Developing Design
                      Criteria for Connections around Cutout  (Slot) Openings”,  SNAME Transactions, pp.
                      227-248.
                  15.  Munse, W.H.,  Wibur, T.W.,  Telalian, M.L., Nicol, K., and Wilson, K. (1983), “Fatigue
                       Characetrization of  Fabricated  Ship Details  for  Design”,  Ship  Structure Committee
                      Report SSC-318.
                  16.  Yoneya, T.,  Kumano, A.,  Yamamoto, N.  and  Shigemi, T.  (1993), “Hull  Cracking of
                      Very Large Ship Structures”, Integrity of Offshore Structures - 5.
                  17.  Zhao, CT, Bai, Y and  Shin Y.  (2001), “Extreme Response and  Fatigue Damages for
                      FPSO Structural Analysis”, Proc. of ISOPE’2001.
                  18.  Wirsching, P.H.  and Chen Y.N. (1987), “Fatigue Design Criteria for TLP Tendons”, J.
                      Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 113 (7).
   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400