Page 507 - Marine Structural Design
P. 507

Chapter 27 Fatigue Reliability                                        483








                                 2                  0.25               0.61 to 1.65
                                 3                  0.20               0.67 to 1.50
                                4                   0.15               0.74 to 1.35




                   Some general guidelines regarding the choice of level
                   Level 1    Use for a safety check expression using the design stress. Default values
                              are assumed for the Weibull shape parameter and the service life. There is
                              little confidence in the estimates of the loads.
                   Level 2    The  Weibull  model  for  long-term  stress  ranges  is  used.  Reasonable
                              estimates of the parameters are available.
                   Level 3    The  Weibull  model  for  long-term  stress  ranges  is  used  with  good
                              estimates of  the  parameters obtained from  tests  on  similar  ships.  The
                              histogram and/or spectral methods with only moderate confidence of the
                              parameters.
                   Level 4    A  comprehensive dynamic and  structural analysis of  the  ship over  its
                              predicted service history has been performed as the basis for the input for
                              the histogram or spectral method.


                  27.3  Fatigue Reliability Models
                  27.3.1  Introduction

                  The calculation of the fatigue damage for a structural detail is based on several variables. Each
                  of these variables is to some extent random.  In order to account for this randomness, implicit
                  and explicit safety factors are widely used. The safety factors are rather subjective measures
                  that are calibrated based on past experience. Information about the degree of uncertainty of
                  different variables can not be used effectively.
                  Reliability theory  offers a  way  to  include uncertainty information in  the  fatigue damage
                  calculation. It allows calculating the component reliability, i.e. the probability that a detail has
                  failed at the end of the specified lifetime. Using system reliability it is possible to evaluate the
                  reliability of a system of structural details.
                  A probabilistic approach to fatigue life prediction consists of probabilistic methods applied in
                  combination with either S-N approach or fracture mechanics approach. Probabilistic analysis
                  in combination with the S-N approach is usually carried out at the structural design stage while
                  the  probabilistic  analysis  of  remaining  life  after  inspection  is  usually  based  on  fracture
                  mechanics (FM) techniques.
   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509   510   511   512