Page 172 - Mathematical Techniques of Fractional Order Systems
P. 172

160  Mathematical Techniques of Fractional Order Systems


            is that any control scheme that is performing a parameter estimation, which
            is simultaneously being used in the controller parameter updating, leads to
            the situation of two IOEM with a constraint on their true parameters. Thus,
            AL taking into account this parameter linkage are called for. This is pre-
            cisely the problem solved in Duarte and Narendra (1988a, 1996a) in a gen-
            eral manner that leads to better solutions than those where the parameters of
            the controller and the identifier are independently updated. It is worth men-
            tioning that the so-called combined direct and indirect adaptive control intro-
            duced by Duarte & Narendra (e.g., combined model reference adaptive
            control) (Duarte and Narendra, 1987a,b, 1989a,b) and the dynamical indirect
            adaptive control (e.g., dynamical indirect MRAC) (Duarte and Narendra,
            1988b, 1996b) belong to this class of problems.
               On the other hand, a great deal of attention has been paid on the study of
            the FO systems (FOS) where FO operators (integrals and/or derivatives)
            rather than IO operators are used either in the plant description (modeling)
            and/or in the controller design. This fact has allowed to expand the control-
            lers/observers designs to include FO operators providing additional degrees
            of freedom in the design. For example, the IOPID controller contains three
            design parameters (proportional, integral, and derivative constants ) whereas
            the FOPID contains five parameters (proportional, integral, and derivative
            constants; plus the integral and derivative orders) augmenting the search
            space for tuning the controller allowing to obtain better solutions according
            to prespecified performance indexes. As an example, in Vale ´rio and Da
            Costa (2006) is presented a Ziegler Nichols type of method to tune FOPID
            controllers, whereas in Aguila-Camacho and Duarte-Mermoud (2013)an
            application of FOPID to an automatic voltage regulator (AVR) is discussed.
            The AVR is a controller whose main purpose is to maintain the voltage level
            in an electric generator by adjusting the generator exciter voltage. In that
            work a genetic optimization algorithm was used to tune a FOPID. Several
            other applications of FO controllers and observers have been lately reported.
            It is worth mentioning the work by (Kavuran et al., 2016) where an experi-
            mental test platform of a low-cost coaxial rotor was developed and a model
            reference adaptive controller with FO AL was explored and implemented in
            MATLAB/Simulink. In Huan et al. (2016) a method is proposed to solve all
            possible FOPD controllers to stabilize a given system. Robust stability with
            phase margin and gain margin is considered and the parameters regions are
            described on the delay-parameter plane. The rather complex dynamics of
            lithium-ion battery is described in Takamatsu and Ohmori (2015) as a frac-
            tional order (FO) system and then the Kreisselmeier-type of adaptive
            observer is used to estimate the state and parameters battery. The results
            obtained by numerical simulations indicate that the proposed model repre-
            sents adequately the system behavior.
   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177