Page 190 - Mathematical Techniques of Fractional Order Systems
P. 190

178  Mathematical Techniques of Fractional Order Systems


            where nðtÞ corresponds to a random noise uniformly distributed, with maxi-
            mum amplitude of 0.5, which represents 50% of the magnitude of the ideal
            reference. A simulation time of T 5 1500 s will be used, although for
            Oe 1 ðtÞO only the first 50 s are shown in the figures. The the evolution of
            Oe 1 ðtÞO, Oe 2 ðtÞO in this noisy scenario is presented in Fig. 6.3. The evolution
            of the norm of the parameter errors Oφ ðtÞO, Oφ ðtÞO, on the other hand, is
                                                     2
                                             1
            presented in Fig. 6.4.
               It can be seen from Figs. 6.3 and 6.4 that the noise indeed affect the evo-
            lution of the signals in the scheme. In order to characterize and have a better
            insight on the behavior of the adaptive schemes when noise is present, the
            following two indexes are calculated
                                         ð T
                                                  2
                                  ISN 1 5   Oe 1 ðτÞO dτ              ð6:37Þ
                                          t50
                                          T
                                         ð
                                                  2
                                  ISN 2 5   Oe 2 ðτÞO dτ              ð6:38Þ
                                          t50
               Table 6.1 shows the resulting values of indexes (6.37) and (6.38) for the
            simulations, which helps appreciating the results numerically.
               As can be seen from Table 6.1, for the first FOEM2 the ISN 1 is lower for
            the case of using CFOAL compared with the case of using NCFOAL, for
            every α used, which represents an important improvement in the system
            behavior. In the case of the second FOEM2, it can be seen from Table 6.1
            that for α 5 0:5, the NCFOAL behaves clearly better than the CFOAL, e.g.,
            the ISN 2 is lower for the NCFOAL. However, this behavior starts changing
            as α increases, and for α 5 0:7 both approaches have similar ISN 2 . For the
            cases α 5 0:9 and α 5 1 the CFOAL behaves better than the NCFOAL.
               Summarizing, it can be concluded that the use of CFOAL can lead to an
            improvement in the adaptive systems behavior. Thus, they should be consid-
            ered as a possible alternative in the design stage, wherever it is possible to
            implement them.

            6.6  CONCLUSION

            In this chapter, it has been proved that given two fractional order EM 2 with
            linear constraints on their true unknown parameters, it is possible to derive
            coupled fractional AL including the information of the constraint, guarantee-
            ing stability of the resulting adaptive system for αAð0; 1Š. The same conclu-
            sions have been established for two fractional order EM 3, also with linear
            parameter constraints. Also, it was analytically proved that the mean value
            of the squared norm of the state error vector converges asymptotically to
            zero in both cases.
               Besides, simulation studies showed that the inclusion of the additional
            information in the coupled fractional AL results in a better dynamic behavior
   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195