Page 323 - Mechanics Analysis Composite Materials
P. 323

308                 Mechanics and analysis of composite materials








             These equations generalize Eqs. (3.76)-(3.79)  for the case of anisotropic fibers and
             specify apparent CTE of a unidirectional ply.
               As  an  example,  consider  a  high-modulus  carbon-epoxy  composite  tested  by
             Rogers et al.  (I 977).  Microstructural  parameters  of  the  material  are  as  follows
             (2'  = 27°C):
             Efl  = 41 1  GPa, Eo = 6.6 GPa, vfl  = 0.06,
             V~L= 0.35, Efl  = -1.2  x   1/"C, CC~L  27.3 x  lo-'  1/"C,
             Em= 5.7 GPa, vm = 0.316, am= 45 x  IO-'  l/"C, of = om = 0.5.
             For these properties, Eqs. (7.16) yield
             El = 208.3 GPa, E2  = 6.5 GPa, V~I= 0.33,
             tll   -0.57  x  IOp6  1/"C, CI?= 43.4 x   I/"C,
             while experimental results are
             El = 208.6 GPa, E2  = 6.3 GPa, v21 = 0.33
             CII  = -0.5  x   I/"C, M? = 29.3 x  IO-'   1/"C.
             Thus,  it  can  be  concluded  that  the  first-order microstructural  model  providing
             proper  results  for  longitudinal  material  characteristics  fails  to  predict  a2  with
             required  accuracy.  Discussion  and  conclusions  concerning  this  problem  and
             presented  in  Section  3.3  for  elastic  constants  are  valid  for  thermal  expansion
             coefficients as well.  For practical applications a1 and  CI? are normally determined
             by  experimental methods.  However,  in  contrast  to  the  elasticity  problem,  for
             which  the  knowledge  of  experimental  elastic  constants  and  material  strength
             excludes the micromechanical models from consideration, for the thermoelasticity
             problems,  these  models  provide  us  with  useful  information  even  if  we  know
             experimental thermal expansion coefficients. Indeed, consider a unidirectional ply
             that  is  subjected  to  uniform  heating  which  induces  only  thermal  strains,  i.e.,
             EIT = E:,   E~T= E:,  Y~~~= 0.  Then,  Eqs. (7.14) yield  GI = 0,  Q = 0,  212  = 0.  For
             homogeneous  materials,  this  means,  that  no  stresses  occur  under  uniform
             heating.  However,  this  is  not  the  case  for  a  composite  ply.  Generalizing
             Eqs. (3.74)  that  specify  longitudinal stresses in  the  fibers and  in  the  matrix  we
             get





             where  aI and  a2  are  specified by  Eqs. (7.16).  Thus,  because  thermal  expansion
             coefficients of the fibers and the matrix are different from those of the material, there
             exist microstructural thermal stresses in  the composite structural elements. These
             stresses are self-balanced. Indeed
   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328