Page 79 - Mechanics of Asphalt Microstructure and Micromechanics
P. 79

72   Ch a p t e r  Th r e e


                                                Statistical Information
                TM06–TM11       Standev         Mean        Maximum        Minimum
              TM06           0.01          0.003881       0.179551      3.3E-05
              TM07           0.004659      0.003301       0.095954      6.8E-05
              TM08           0.008796      0.006858       0.13898       0.000112
              TM09           0.007164      0.006482       0.120672      0
              TM10           0.009126      0.011444       0.097332      0.000612
              TM11           0.010233      0.011708       0.116603      0.000433
              TABLE 3.2  Statistical information of the effective gradient of TM06–TM11.

                 From Table 3.1 it can be observed that the local volume fraction in the coarse mix
              (TM10 and TM11) is the largest of the three mixes. It means that void volume (larger
              than 0.3 mm in size) of the coarse mix is the largest among the three mixes although
              their total void volume contents are the same (about 8%). The fine plus mix (TM08 and
              TM09) is in the middle and the fine mix (TM06 and TM07) has the smallest void vol-
              ume fraction. There are no apparent differences between the two specimens of the
              same mixes.
                 From Table 3.2 it can be noted that the mean value of the gradient and the standard
              deviation are apparently different for the three mixes. TM10 and TM11 have the largest
              effective gradient; TM8 and TM9 have the medium effective gradient; and TM6 and
              TM7 have the smallest effective gradient.

              3.4.1.2 Data Interpretation
              To allow for more intuitive understanding about how local void volume fraction and
              its gradient affect the stress in a heterogeneous material, Equation 3-10 is written in
              terms of local void volume fraction. If g 1  and g 2  represent the local volume fractions of
              voids at two points l distance away, then the local solid volume fractions are respec-
              tively v 1  = 1 − g 1  and v 2  = 1 − g 2 . The stress gradient is then:
                                  T  2  − T  1  ⎡ γ (  − γ )  γ  + γ  ⎤
                                                             1 δ
                                    ij  ij  = β ⎢ 2  2  1  (  1  2  − ) ⎥        (3-14)
                                     l       ⎣    l     2      ⎦  ij

                 Equation 3-14 indicates that the differences in stresses between two points in the ma-
              terial space are related to the gradient of local void fractions and the average local void
              fractions of the two points. When the two points are close, the stress gradient is propor-
              tional to the product of the gradient of the local void volume fraction and the mean local
              void volume fraction. This has an important implication: the stresses in the specimen are
              not uniformly distributed. The larger the average local void volume fraction and its gra-
              dient, the greater the internal stress difference or the more significant the stress concen-
              tration. The more severe stress concentration may directly lead to faster crack initiation
              and propagation and strain localization related to rutting or permanent deformation.
              Therefore, it may be deduced that the coarse mix may be the most prone to rutting and
              fatigue cracking and the fine mix may be the least prone to rutting and fatigue cracking.
              This theory based deduction is consistent with the ranking of the field performance of the
              three mixes. This deduction is also based on an implicit assumption that small voids may
              self-heal quickly and affect the fatigue and rutting properties to a lesser degree.
                 While the above method quantifies the void volume fractions in regular cubic or
              rectangular cells and is very convenient, definition of the cells may not be necessarily
   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84