Page 104 - Media Effects Advances in Theory and Research

4. MEDIA CONSUMPTION AND PERCEPTIONS OF SOCIAL REALITY 93

Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In
E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles
(pp. 133–168). New York: Guilford Press.
Higgins, E. T., Bargh, J. A., & Lombardi, W. (1985). The nature of priming effects on cate-
gorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 11, 59–69.
Higgins, E. T., & Brendl, C. M. (1995). Accessibility and applicability: Some “activation
rules” influencing judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 218–243.
Higgins, E. T., & King, G. (1981). Accessibility of social constructs: Information process-
ing consequences of individual and contextual variability. In N. Cantor & J. F.
Kihlstrom (Eds.), Personality, cognition and social interaction (pp. 69–121). Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Higgins, E. T., Rholes, W. S., & Jones, C. R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression
formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 141–154.
Hirsch, P. (1980). The scary world of the nonviewer and other anomalies: A reanalysis of
Gerbner et al.’s findings on cultivation analysis. Communication Research, 7, 403–456.
Hughes, M. (1980). The fruits of cultivation analysis: A reexamination of some effects of
television watching. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44, 287–302.
Iyengar, S. (1990). The accessibility bias in politics: Television news and public opinion.
International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 2, 1–15.
Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological
Bulletin, 114, 3–28.
Lichtenstein, S., Slovic, P., Fischhoff, G., Layman, M., & Combs, B. (1978). Judged fre-
quency of lethal events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Mem-
ory, 6, 551–578.
Manis, M., Shedler, J., Jonides, J., & Nelson, T. E. (1993). Availability heuristic in judg-
ments of set size and frequency of occurrence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychol-
ogy, 65, 448–457.
Mares, M. L. (1996). The role of source confusions in television’s cultivation of social real-
ity judgments. Human Communication Research, 23, 278–297.
McGuire, W. J. (1960). Cognitive consistency and attitude change. Journal of Abnormal and
Social Psychology, 60, 345–353.
McGuire, W. J. (1986). The myth of massive media impact: Savagings and salvagings. In
G. Comstock (Ed.), Public communication and behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 173–257). New York:
Academic Press.
Moore, D. L., Hausknecht, D., & Thamodaran, K. (1986). Time compression, response
opportunity, and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 85–99.
Morgan, M., & Shanahan, J. (1996). Two decades of cultivation research: An appraisal and
meta-analysis. In B. R. Burleson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 20 (pp. 1–45). Newbury
Park, CA: Sage.
Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inferences: Strategies and shortcomings of human judg-
ment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Ogles, R. M., & Hoffner, C. (1987). Film violence and perceptions of crime: The cultiva-
tion effect. In M. L. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 10 (pp. 384–394). New-
bury Park, CA: Sage.
O’Guinn, T. C., & Shrum, L. J. (1997). The role of television in the construction of con-
sumer reality. Journal of Consumer Research, 23, 278–294.
Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral
routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1990). Involvement and persuasion: Tradition versus inte-
gration. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 367–374.