Page 105 - Media Effects Advances in Theory and Research

94 SHRUM

Phillips, D. (1983). The impact of mass media violence on U.S. homicides. American Soci-
ological Review, 48, 560–568.
Ratneshwar, S., & Chaiken, S. (1991). Comprehension’s role in persuasion: The case of its
moderating effect on the persuasive impact of source cues. Journal of Consumer
Research, 18, 52–62.
Reeves, B., Chaffee, S., & Tims, A. (1982). Social cognition and mass communication
research. In M. E. Roloff & C. R. Berger (Eds.), Social cognition and mass communication
(pp. 287–326). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Schank, R., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H., & Simons, A.
(1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Jour-
nal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 195–202.
Shapiro, M. A., & Lang, A. (1991). Making television reality: Unconscious processes in the
construction of social reality. Communication Research, 18, 685–705.
Sherman, S. J., & Corty, E. (1984). Cognitive heuristics. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.),
Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 189–286). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
Shrum, L. J. (1995). Assessing the social influence of television: A social cognition per-
spective on cultivation effects. Communication Research, 22, 402–429.
Shrum, L. J. (1996). Psychological processes underlying cultivation effects: Further tests
of construct accessibility. Human Communication Research, 22, 482–509.
Shrum, L. J. (1997). The role of source confusion in cultivation effects may depend on pro-
cessing strategy: A comment on Mares (1996). Human Communication Research, 24,
349–358.
Shrum, L. J. (1999a). The effect of data-collection method on the cultivation effect: Implications
for the heuristic processing model of cultivation effects. Paper presented at the meeting of
the International Communication Association, San Francisco, CA.
Shrum, L. J. (1999b). The relationship of television viewing with attitude strength and
extremity: Implications for the cultivation effect. Media Psychology, 1, 3–25.
Shrum, L. J. (2001). Processing strategy moderates the cultivation effect. Human Commu-
nication Research, 27, 94–120.
Shrum, L. J., & Darmanin Bischak, V. (2001). Mainstreaming, resonance, and impersonal
impact: Testing moderators of the cultivation effect for estimates of crime risk. Human
Communication Research, 27, 187–215.
Shrum, L. J., & O’Guinn, T. C. (1993). Processes and effects in the construction of social
reality: Construct accessibility as an explanatory variable. Communication Research, 20,
436–471.
Shrum, L. J., O’Guinn, T. C., Semenik, R. J., & Faber, R. J. (1991). Processes and effects in
the construction of normative consumer beliefs: The role of television. In R. H. Hol-
man & M. R. Solomon (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 18, pp. 755–763).
Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
Shrum, L. J., Wyer, R. S., & O’Guinn, T. C. (1998). The effects of television consumption on
social perceptions: The use of priming procedures to investigate psychological
processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 447–458.
Sparks, G. G., & Ogles, R. M. (1990). The difference between fear of victimization and the
probability of being victimized: Implications for cultivation. Journal of Broadcasting &
Electronic Media, 34, 351–358.
Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R. S. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of
information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 37, 1660–1672.