Page 208 - Media Effects Advances in Theory and Research

7. MASS MEDIA ATTITUDE CHANGE 197

Snyder, M. (1987). Public appearances, private realities: The psychology of self-monitoring. New
York: Freeman.
Snyder, M., & DeBono, K. G. (1989). Understanding the functions of attitudes: Lessons
from personality and social behavior. In A. Pratkanis, S. Breckler, & A. Greenwald
(Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 339–359). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
Staats, A. W., & Staats, C. (1958). Attitudes established by classical conditioning. Journal of
Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 159–167.
Stiff, J. B. (1986). Cognitive processing of persuasive message cues: A meta-analytic
review of the effects of supporting information on attitudes. Communication Mono-
graphs, 53, 75–89.
Strong, E. K. (1925). The psychology of selling and advertising. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Suber, B. (1997, December 3). Talk radio can fuel racism. St. Louis Post-Dispatch, p. B7.
Swasy, J. L., & Munch, J. M. (1985). Examining the target of receiver elaborations: Rhetor-
ical question effects on source processing and persuasion. Journal of Consumer
Research, 11, 877–886.
Taylor, S. E. (1981). The interface of cognitive and social psychology. In J. H. Harvey (Ed.),
Cognition, social behavior, and the environment (pp. 189–211). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates.
Tesser, A., Martin, L., & Mendolia, M. (1995). The impact of thought on attitude extremity
and attitude-behavior consistency. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude
strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 73–92). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
Wartella, E., & Middlestadt, S. (1991). Mass communication and persuasion: The evolu-
tion of direct effects, limited effects, information processing, and affect and arousal
models. In L. Donohew, H. E. Sypher, & W. J. Bukoski (Eds.), Persuasive communication
and drug abuse prevention (pp. 53–69). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wartella, E., & Reeves, B. (1985). Historical trends in research on children and the media:
1900–1960. Journal of Communications, 35, 118–133.
Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1994). Mood management across affective states: The
hedonic contingency hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66,
1034–1048.
Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1995). Flexible correction processes in social judgment: The
role of naive theories in corrections for perceived bias. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 68, 36–51.
Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1996). Effects of mood on persuasion processes: Enhancing,
reducing, and biasing scrutiny of attitude-relevant information. In L. L. Martin &
A. Tesser (Eds.), Striving and feeling: Interactions between goals and affect (pp. 329–362).
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1997). The flexible correction model: The role of naive the-
ories of bias in bias correction. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psy-
chology (Vol. 29, pp. 141–208). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (2001). Understanding effects of mood through the elabora-
tion likelihood and flexible correction models. In L. L. Martin, & G. L. Clore (Eds.),
Theories of mood and cognition: A user’s guidebook (pp. 177–210). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates.
Wegener, D. T., Petty, R. E., & Klein, D. J. (1994). Effects of mood on high elaboration atti-
tude change: The mediating role of likelihood judgments. European Journal of Social
Psychology, 23, 25–44.
Wegener, D. T., Petty, R. E., & Smith, S. M. (1995). Positive mood can increase or decrease
message scrutiny: The hedonic contingency view of mood and message processing.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 5–15.