Page 85 - Media Effects Advances in Theory and Research
P. 85

74                                                         SHRUM

           In summary, it seems reasonable to think that media consumption—
        whether it be the frequency, recency, or the content features of viewing—
        may serve to enhance the accessibility of particular constructs. This
        “media effect” is an example of the interrelatedness of the Heuristic/
        Sufficiency Principle and the Accessibility Principle: Media consumption
        enhances accessibility, which influences the information that becomes a
        part of that small subset of available information.

        Consequences of Accessibility

        Simply demonstrating that media information may play a role in enhanc-
        ing the accessibility of particular constructs is not sufficient to provide an
        explanation of media effects. It is also necessary to show that enhanced
        accessibility in turn produces effects that are consistent with the media
        effects literature.
           The consequences of accessibility are directly related to Principle 2: The
        information that is most accessible is that which is most likely to be used
        to construct a judgment. Moreover, the way in which the most accessible
        information is used is a function of the type of judgment that is made.

           Judgments about Persons.  One of the more consistent findings in the
        social cognition literature is that when people make judgments about
        other persons, they tend to use the constructs that are most readily acces-
        sible from memory (Accessibility Principle). In the now-classic priming
        studies (e.g., Higgins et al., 1977; Srull & Wyer, 1979, 1980), when partici-
        pants were required to form trait judgments based on the ambiguous
        behaviors of a target person, they tended to use the trait concepts that
        had been “primed” (i.e., made more accessible) to interpret those
        ambiguous behaviors (for a review, see Higgins, 1996). The interpreta-
        tions influenced participants’ judgments about the target’s behaviors
        (e.g., reckless, persistent) as well as judgments about how much they
        liked the target. These results have been replicated numerous times, even
        under conditions of subliminal presentation of the prime (Bargh &
        Pietromonaco, 1982).

           Attitude and Belief Judgments. Evaluations of an object may be con-
        structed from beliefs that are most accessible (Fishbein & Ajzen, 1975). In
        the Fishbein and Ajzen model, attitude construction is a function of par-
        ticular beliefs and the evaluations of those beliefs. It follows, then, that
        which beliefs are put into the attitude construction equation may be a
        function of which beliefs are most accessible at the moment. In a series of
        experiments, Wyer and colleagues (Henninger & Wyer, 1976; Wyer &
        Hartwick, 1984) examined the relation between accessible beliefs and
   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90