Page 260 - Membranes for Industrial Wastewater Recovery and Re-Use
P. 260

Case studies  2 2 9


            Table 5.1  Contractual water quality
                                                       ~
            Parameter             Units                Contractual        Expected
            Conductivity          ps cm-'               70                 50
            Silica dissolved      mg I-'  Si02           1                  0.5
            Sodium                mg I-'  Na            20                 15
            Calcium               mg I-'  CaCO3          5                  2
            TOC                   mg I-'  C              2.5               <2
            Polysaccharides       Yg  I-'              100                 50


            sewage  eMuent  which  has  a  naturally  variable  effluent  quality.  A  similar
            situation exists in the USA at Water Factory 2 1 where a multiple treatment train
            is used. This comprises of pH adjustment to 10, coagulation, super chlorination,
            clarification, depth filtration, pH adjustment to 6 and finally dechlorination. This
            approach suffers from a number of  drawbacks including a large chemical use,
            large footprint and high operating costs. The original process train also included
            activated carbon but was discontinued due to fines coming out of the filter beds
            and blocking the RO tubes. As an alternative to the above, AWG investigated the
            use  of  microfiltration  membranes. Previous  research  had  shown  membrane
            processes to be a suitable unit operation for the removal of  solids, bacteria and
            microorganisms capable of robustly producing a silt density index below 2. Four
            commercial  systems  were  tested  including  the  specific  pre  screening
            requirements  which  ranged  from  1 mm  screens  to  sand  filters  (-50  pm
            equivalent screen).
              The final process train selected consisted of a pre-screen, microfiltration plant
            and a reverse osmosis plant (Fig. 5.1). Wastewater  from the screens and the
            microfiltration  plant is returned to the head of the sewage works. Concentrate
            disposal is achieved by dilution with final emuent from the sewage works in the
            final effluent chamber and discharged into the tidal section of the river Nene.

            Pre-screens
            Appropriate  pre-screening  was  found  to  be  important  to  ensure  suitable
            operability  of  the  plant.  Assessment  of  the  different  options  resulted  in  a
            Hydrotech  HDF  830 drum screen being  installed.  The  screen removes  solids
            larger  than  150 pin  and  has  a  self-cleaning  facility  to  remove  the retained
            solids by back flushing with screen effluent. The screen is manufactured from
            stainless steel with a polyester cloth insert material. To ensure constant flow to
            the membrane plant the screens were fitted with variable speed pumps which
            controlled the level in the screened water tank.

            Microfiltration
            The  screened  effluent  then  passes  to  the  microfiltration  plant.  The  plant
            comprises  two  parallel  streams, each containing  17 modules.  Each  module
            contains 50 m2 of PVDF hollow fibre membrane operating in a semi dead-end
            mode with the flow from outside to in. The membrane material is rated with a
            nominal pore size of 0.1 pm and fabricated into individual membrane units with
   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265