Page 101 - Microaggressions in Everyday Live Race, Gender, and Sexual Orientation
P. 101

The Microaggression Process Model  75

                     my authentic feelings with, so that there ’ s sort of this healing, there ’ s just this healing
                     circle that I have around myself, and these are people who I don ’ t have to be rational

                     with if I ’ m battling racism. ”  One Black coworker described how he checks

                     things out with other Blacks in the worksite nonverbally,  “ I mean, you see it
                     in their eyes, like a connection across the room     . . .     and they tell you all the things

                     that have been going on in their office that ’ s been driving them crazy. ”   The sanity

                     check serves multiple purposes: (1) it reaffirms one ’ s experiential reality, (2) it
                     communicates that the target is not alone and that others experience similar
                     things, and (3) it creates a validating group experience that immunizes targets
                     against future subtle expressions of racism, sexism, or heterosexism.

                         Empowering and Validating Self
                       Victim blaming is a common process often facilitated because of attributional
                     ambiguity (Crocker  &  Major, 1989). Is the plight of people of color (high
                     unemployment rates, low educational attainment, poverty, etc.), for example,
                     due to internal weaknesses and undesirable attributes (less intelligence, weak
                     motivation, poor family values), or does the blame reside in the larger external
                     environment (prejudice and discrimination, structural inequities, etc.)? Are
                     targets of a microaggression simply misreading the situation due to oversen-
                     sitivity or a defect in reality testing, or have they accurately assessed the hostile
                     and invalidating external situation?
                        One of the adaptive mechanisms used by our participants against microag-
                     gressive incidents is the shifting of  “ fault ”  to the aggressor rather than the target.
                     People of color in our study reported this type of reaction as  “ empowering ”
                     and  “ shielding ”  because it locates blame and fault in the perpetrator rather
                     than themselves. One participant stated,   “ I don ’ t blame it on myself; it ’ s not like,
                     what ’ s wrong with me? It ’ s like, oh, that ’ s that White unconsciousness that they ’ re so

                     well trained in. ”  This sentiment is also shared by others in our study:

                            African American male:  “ I feel good in that, you know,  ‘ cause I won ’ t want

                          to go home anymore trying to figure out what happened, and it does take a
                          certain amount of courage for me to say, you know, I ’ m going to stop asking
                          myself this question, I ’ m going to ask it to you. ”

                            African American female:   “ I find that is keeping your voice  . . .  . If I decide
                          I want to do an intervention, I ’ m not necessarily doing it for them. I ’ m doing
                          it for me. ”
                         In many respects empowering and validating the self seems to be highly
                     correlated with people of color, women, and LGBTs who are fi rmly rooted










                                                                                    1/19/10   6:09:09 PM
          c04.indd   75                                                             1/19/10   6:09:09 PM
          c04.indd   75
   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106