Page 34 - Microaggressions in Everyday Live Race, Gender, and Sexual Orientation
P. 34

8  racial, gender, and sexual-orientation microaggressions

               these include racial profiling, segregated churches and neighborhoods,

               discriminatory hiring and promotion practices, and educational curricula
               that ignore and distort the history of minorities. Institutional bias is often
               masked in the policies of standard operating procedures (SOPs) that are
               applied equally to everyone, but which have outcomes that disadvantage cer-
               tain groups while advantaging others.
                    Cultural racism is perhaps the most insidious and damaging form of racism
               because it serves as an overarching umbrella under which individual and
               institutional racism thrives. It is defined as the individual and institutional

               expression of the superiority of one group ’ s cultural heritage (arts/crafts,
               history, traditions, language, and values) over another group ’ s, and the power
               to impose those standards upon other groups (Sue, 2004). For example, Native
               Americans have at times been forbidden to practice their religions ( “ We are a
               Christian people ” ) or to speak in their native tongues ( “ English is superior ” ),
               and in contemporary textbooks the histories or contributions of people of
               color have been neglected or distorted ( “ Western history and civilization are
               superior ” ). These are all examples of cultural racism.
                    As awareness of overt racism has increased, however, people have become
               more sophisticated in recognizing the overt expressions of individual, institu-
               tional, and cultural bigotry and discrimination. Because of our belief in equality
               and democracy, and because of the Civil Rights movement, we as a nation
               now strongly condemn racist, sexist, and heterosexist acts because they are
               antithetical to our stated values of fairness, justice, and nondiscrimination
               (Dovidio, Gaertner, Kawakami,  &  Hodson, 2002; Sears, 1988). Unfortunately,
               this statement may apply only at the conscious level.



                   The Changing Face of Racism
                Although overt expressions of racism (hate crimes, physical assaults, use of
               racial epithets, and blatant discriminatory acts) may have declined, some argue
               that its expression has morphed into a more contemporary and insidious
               form that hides in our cultural assumptions/beliefs/values, in our institutional
               policies and practices, and in the deeper psychological recesses of our individ-
               ual psyches (DeVos  &  Banaji, 2005; Dovidio, Gaertner, Kawakami,  &  Hodson
               2002; Nelson, 2006; Sue, Capodilupo, Nadal,  &  Torino, 2008). In other words,
               race experts believe that racism has become invisible, subtle, and more indirect,
               operating below the level of conscious awareness, and continuing to oppress in
               unseen ways. This contemporary manifestation has various names: symbolic









                                                                                    1/20/10   2:55:37 PM
          c01.indd   8                                                              1/20/10   2:55:37 PM
          c01.indd   8
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39