Page 36 - Microaggressions in Everyday Live Race, Gender, and Sexual Orientation
P. 36

10  racial, gender, and sexual-orientation microaggressions

               African American psychologist, in the late 1970s produced the first edition of

               his now classic book  Even the Rat Was White,  which took psychology to task
               for being primarily a White Eurocentric fi eld, neglecting the contributions of
               people of color in historical storytelling, and for unintentionally elevating the
               contributions of one group (primarily White males), while denigrating Asian,
               African, and Latin  American contributors through  “ benign neglect. ”  The
               hidden message to students of color was that American psychology is supe-
               rior (other psychologies are inferior), that it is universal, and that students
               of color should accept this  “ reality. ”  White students are affirmed in this curricu-

               lum, but students of color feel that their identities are constantly assailed in
               the classroom. Black students are likely to expend considerable emotional
               energy protecting their own integrity while at the same time being distracted
               from fully engaging in the learning process (Sue, Lin, Torino, Capodilupo,  &
               Rivera, 2009).
                    Second, Professor Richardson seems to equate rational discourse with
               approaching topics in a calm and objective manner. When he tells the Black
               student to  “ calm down ”  or implies that they are  “ too emotional, ”  the Professor
               may unintentionally be delivering another racial microaggression with mul-
               tiple hidden fears, assumptions, and biased values: (a) Blacks are prone to
               emotional outbursts, can get out of control, and may become violent; (b) emo-
               tion is antagonistic to reason and conversations should be unemotional and
               objective in the classroom; and (c) the communication style of many Blacks
               is dysfunctional and should be discouraged (Sue  &  Sue, 2008). Pathologizing

               Black communication and learning styles has been identified as a common
               microaggression directed toward  African  Americans (Constantine  &  Sue,
               2007; Sue, Capodilupo, Nadal, et al., 2008). Studies suggest that communica-
               tion and learning styles of Black Americans may differ from those of Whites
               (DePaulo, 1992; Kochman, 1981); for example, affect, emotion, and passion
               are considered positive attributes of the communication process because they
               indicate sincere interest and seriousness toward the material or subject matter,
               while objectivity and unemotional responses indicate insincerity and lack of
               connection.
                    Third, Professor Richardson ’ s compliment toward Justin ’ s intelligent
               analysis of both perspectives and his ability to articulate the issues well was
               found to be offensive by some of the Black students. Why? To answer this
               question requires an understanding of historical racial stereotypes and their
               interactional dynamics. This situation is very similar to what occurred in
               the 2007 to 2008 democratic presidential primaries when both Senators Joe









                                                                                    1/20/10   2:55:37 PM
          c01.indd   10                                                             1/20/10   2:55:37 PM
          c01.indd   10
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41