Page 121 - MODELING OF ASPHALT CONCRETE
P. 121

Complex Modulus Characterization of Asphalt Concr ete      99


                    using dynamic stress levels of 138 to 965 kPa for colder temperatures of −9, 4.4, and
                    21.1°C. For warmer temperatures of 37.8 and 54.4°C, stress levels of 46–68 kPa and
                    about 21 kPa were used, respectively. For each temperature level, specimens were tested
                    in a decreasing order of frequency; frequencies used were 25, 10, 5, 1, 0.5, and 0.1 Hz. A
                    60-second rest period was used between each frequency to allow some specimen
                    recovery before applying new loading at lower frequency. This was done to reduce the
                    possible damage and heat accumulation during testing. This testing was conducted
                    trying to stay under 150 microstrains at all temperature and frequency levels.
                       For the confined testing program, the testing frame was equipped with a triaxial
                    cell capable of applying cell pressure up to 690 kPa. High-temperature stress levels
                    were determined based upon the stress to strength ratios determined using cohesion
                    and friction parameters from the triaxial strength test at 54.4°C. At colder temperatures,
                    the deviatoric stress was changed depending upon the stiffness of the mix. A 60-second
                    rest period was used between each frequency similar to the unconfined testing.
                       The instrumentation and testing setup is illustrated in two photos for confined
                    dynamic modulus testing. Figure 4-8(a) demonstrates the loading of a specimen to the
                    pressure cell, and Fig. 4-8(b) shows the pressure cell sealed and ready for testing.
                       Based on the research, a provisional recommendation for the stiffness parameter for
                                                                                           ∗
                                                   ∗
                    rutting was the dynamic modulus |E | of the mix. For dense graded mixtures, the |E |
                    parameter could be obtained at an unconfined stress state using small stress levels to
                    stay in the linear viscoelastic region. The provisional recommended test temperature
                    was 54.4°C and the frequency was 5 Hz. These were the conditions under which all
                    mixtures exhibited the best correlation to rutting. Time-temperature superposition
                    principle can be used to translate test results to the desired climatic conditions and
                    traffic speed for the performance criteria.
                       The analysis of the Finnish SMA mixtures indicated that confinement is needed to
                    capture performance of SMA mixtures compared to dense graded mixtures. Therefore,
                    confinement was recommended for testing of SMA and open-graded mixtures. However,
                    the level of confinement needs to be determined for mixtures constructed in the United
                    States.
                                                                         ∗
                       In addition to the axial stiffness, the SST shear modulus |G | was also included in
                    the research program. Testing was conducted by Advanced Asphalt Technologies. The
                                                                ∗
                                                                        ∗
                    overall correlation to rutting was the same for both |E | and |G | values, the correlation
                    coefficient being 0.79. However, the order or ranking of the mixtures was different. This
                    indicates that these two modulus values are not interchangeable, as discussed above.














                             (a)                           (b)
                                      ∗
                    FIGURE 4-8  Confi ned |E | test set up.
   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126