Page 118 - Modern Analytical Chemistry
P. 118

1400-CH04  9/8/99  3:55 PM  Page 101






                                                                               Chapter 4 Evaluating Analytical Data  101

                    Determine whether there is a significant difference in the  29. The following data were collected during a study of the
                    effectiveness of the two preservatives at a= 0.10.  concentration of Zn in samples drawn from several locations
                 26. Using X-ray diffraction, Karstang and Kvalhein     in Lake Erie (all concentrations in parts per million).
                    reported a new method for determining the weight                   2+               2+
                                                     27
                    percent of kalonite in complex clay minerals. To test the        [Zn ] at the     [Zn ] at the
                                                                                      air–water     sediment–water
                    method, nine samples containing known amounts of
                                                                        Location      interface        interface
                    kalonite were prepared and analyzed. The results (as
                    %w/w kalonite) are shown.                              1            0.430            0.415
                 Actual: 5.0 10.0  20.0 40.0  50.0  60.0  80.0  90.0 95.0  2            0.266            0.238
                 Found: 6.8 11.7  19.8 40.5  53.6  61.7  78.9  91.7 94.7   3            0.567            0.390
                                                                           4            0.531            0.410
                    Evaluate the accuracy of the method at a= 0.05.
                                                                           5            0.707            0.605
                 27. Mizutani and colleagues reported the development of a new  6       0.716            0.609
                                              28
                    method for the analysis of l-malate. As part of their study
                    they analyzed a series of beverages using both their method  Determine whether there is a significant difference between
                                                                                         2+
                    and a standard spectrophotometric procedure based on a  the concentration of Zn at the air–water interface and the
                    clinical kit purchased from Boerhinger Scientific. A summary  sediment–water interface at a= 0.05.
                    follows of their results (in parts per million).  30. Ten laboratories were asked to determine the concentration
                                                                        of an analyte A in three standard test samples. Following are
                     Sample          Electrode  Spectrophotometric
                                                                        the results, in parts per million. 30
                     Apple juice 1     34.0            33.4
                                                                        Laboratory   Sample 1   Sample 2   Sample 3
                     Apple juice 2     22.6            28.4
                     Apple juice 3     29.7            29.5                 1          22.6       13.6       16.0
                     Apple juice 4     24.9            24.8                 2          23.0       14.2       15.9
                     Grape juice 1     17.8            18.3                 3          21.5       13.9       16.3
                     Grape juice 2     14.8            15.4                 4          21.9       13.9       16.9
                     Mixed fruit juice 1  8.6           8.5                 5          21.3       13.5       16.7
                     Mixed fruit juice 2  31.4         31.9                 6          22.1       13.5       17.4
                     White wine 1      10.8            11.5                 7          23.1       13.9       17.5
                     White wine 2      17.3            17.6                 8          21.7       13.5       16.8
                     White wine 3      15.7            15.4                 9          22.2       12.9       17.2
                     White wine 4      18.4            18.3                 10         21.7       13.8       16.7
                    Determine whether there is a significant difference between  Determine if there are any potential outliers in Sample 1,
                    the methods at a= 0.05.                             Sample 2, or Sample 3 at a significance level of a= 0.05.
                 28. Alexiev and associates describe an improved photometric  31. When copper metal and powdered sulfur are placed in a
                                              3+
                    method for the determination of Fe based on its     crucible and ignited, the product is a sulfide with an empirical
                    catalytic effect on the oxidation of sulphanilic acid by  formula of Cu x S. The value of x can be determined by
                         29
                    KIO 4 . As part of their study the concentration of   weighing the Cu and S before ignition, and finding the mass
                      3+
                    Fe in human serum samples was determined by the     of Cu x S when the reaction is complete. Following are the Cu/S
                    proposed method and the standard method.            ratios from 62 such experiments.
                    Following are the results, with concentrations in  1.764 1.838  1.865 1.866 1.872 1.877 1.890 1.891 1.891
                    micromoles/L.
                                                                     1.897 1.899  1.900 1.906 1.908 1.910 1.911 1.916 1.919
                     Sample     Proposed Method   Standard Method    1.920 1.922  1.927 1.931 1.935 1.936 1.936 1.937 1.939
                                                                     1.939 1.940  1.941 1.941 1.942 1.943 1.948 1.953 1.955
                        1            8.25               8.06
                                                                     1.957 1.957  1.957 1.959 1.962 1.963 1.963 1.963 1.966
                        2            9.75               8.84
                                                                     1.968 1.969  1.973 1.975 1.976 1.977 1.981 1.981 1.988
                        3            9.75               8.36
                                                                     1.993 1.993  1.995 1.995 1.995 2.017 2.029 2.042
                        4            9.75               8.73
                        5            10.75             13.13            (a) Calculate the mean and standard deviation for these data.
                        6            11.25             13.65            (b) Construct a histogram for this data set. From a visual
                                                                        inspection of your histogram, do the data appear to be
                        7            13.88             13.85
                                                                        normally distributed? (c) In a normally distributed
                        8            14.25             13.43
                                                                        population, 68.26% of all members lie within the range
                    Determine whether there is a significant difference between  m±1s. What percentage of the data lies within the range
                                                                        –
                    the two methods at a= 0.05.                         X ±1s? Does this support your answer to the previous
   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123