Page 163 - Modern Analytical Chemistry
P. 163
1400-CH06 9/9/99 7:40 AM Page 146
146 Modern Analytical Chemistry
Oxalic acid, on the other hand, is oxidized since the oxidation state for carbon in-
creases from +3 in H 2 C 2 O 4 to +4 in CO 2 .
Redox reactions, such as that shown in equation 6.22, can be divided into sepa-
oxidation rate half-reactions that individually describe the oxidation and the reduction
A loss of electrons. processes.
+
H 2 C 2 O 4 (aq)+2H 2 O(l) ® 2CO 2 (g)+2H 3 O (aq)+2e –
reduction
A gain of electrons.
–
3+
2+
Fe (aq)+ e ® Fe (aq)
It is important to remember, however, that oxidation and reduction reactions al-
ways occur in pairs.* This relationship is formalized by the convention of calling the
reducing agent species being oxidized a reducing agent, because it provides the electrons for the re-
A species that donates electrons to duction half-reaction. Conversely, the species being reduced is called an oxidizing
another species. 3+
agent. Thus, in reaction 6.22, Fe is the oxidizing agent and H 2C 2O 4 is the reducing
agent.
oxidizing agent The products of a redox reaction also have redox properties. For example, the
A species that accepts electrons from 2+ 3+
another species. Fe in reaction 6.22 can be oxidized to Fe , while CO 2 can be reduced to H 2 C 2 O 4 .
Borrowing some terminology from acid–base chemistry, we call Fe 2+ the conjugate
reducing agent of the oxidizing agent Fe 3+ and CO 2 the conjugate oxidizing agent of
the reducing agent H 2 C 2 O 4.
Unlike the reactions that we have already considered, the equilibrium position
of a redox reaction is rarely expressed by an equilibrium constant. Since redox reac-
tions involve the transfer of electrons from a reducing agent to an oxidizing agent,
it is convenient to consider the thermodynamics of the reaction in terms of the
electron.
The free energy, ∆G , associated with moving a charge, Q, under a potential, E,
is given by
∆G = EQ
Charge is proportional to the number of electrons that must be moved. For a reac-
tion in which one mole of reactant is oxidized or reduced, the charge, in coulombs, is
Q = nF
where n is the number of moles of electrons per mole of reactant, and F is Faraday’s
–1
constant (96,485 C ×mol ). The change in free energy (in joules per mole; J/mol)
for a redox reaction, therefore, is
∆G =–nFE 6.23
where ∆G has units of joules per mole. The appearance of a minus sign in equation
6.23 is due to a difference in the conventions for assigning the favored direction for
reactions. In thermodynamics, reactions are favored when ∆G is negative, and
redox reactions are favored when E is positive.
The relationship between electrochemical potential and the concentrations
of reactants and products can be determined by substituting equation 6.23 into
equation 6.3
–nFE =–nFE°+ RT ln Q
where E° is the electrochemical potential under standard-state conditions. Dividing
Nernst equation through by –nF leads to the well-known Nernst equation.
An equation relating electrochemical
potential to the concentrations of *Separating a redox reaction into its half-reactions is useful if you need to balance the reaction. One method for
products and reactants. balancing redox reactions is reviewed in Appendix 4.