Page 348 - Modern Analytical Chemistry
P. 348

1400-CH09  9/9/99  2:13 PM  Page 331






                                                                          Chapter 9 Titrimetric Methods of Analysis  331

                                          0.08946 g ´5 = 0.4473 g Ni

                                          0.03025 g ´5 = 0.1513 g Fe

                                          0.02378 g ´5 = 0.1189 g Cr
                     and the %w/w for each metal is
                                        .
                                       0 4473 g
                                               ´ 100 = 62 33.% w/w Ni
                                         0.7176 g
                                       0 1513 g                                    10                           (a)
                                        .
                                               ´ 100 = 21 08.% w/w Fe
                                       0.7176 g                                     9
                                                                                    8
                                                                                    7
                                       0 1189 g                                     6
                                        .
                                              ´ 100 = 16 57.% w/w Cr             pCa  5
                                        .
                                        0 7176 g                                    4                           (b)
                                                                                    3
                                                                                    2
                                                                                    1
                                                                                    0
                                                                                     0.0  20.0  40.0  60.0  80.0  100.0
                 9 C.6 Evaluation of Complexation Titrimetry                                Volume of EDTA (mL)
                 The scale of operations, accuracy, precision, sensitivity, time, and cost of methods  Figure 9.32
                 involving complexation titrations are similar to those described earlier for acid–base  Titration curve for 10 –2  M Ca 2+  with 10 –2  M
                 titrimetric methods. Compared with acid–base titrations, however, complexation  EDTA at (a) pH = 9 and (b) pH = 3.
                 titrations are more selective. Despite the ability of EDTA to form strong complexes
                 with virtually all metal ions, carefully controlling the pH at which the titration is
                 carried out makes it possible to analyze samples containing two or more analytes
                                                                                                    Second
                 (see Example 9.10). The reason that pH can be used to provide selectivity is easily  equivalence point
                 appreciated by examining Figure 9.32. A titration of Ca 2+  at a pH of 9 gives a dis-
                 tinct break in the titration curve because the conditional formation constant (K´
                                                                                    f
                         9
                 = 2.6 ´10 ) is large enough to ensure that the reaction of Ca 2+  and EDTA goes to  Corrected absorbance
                 completion. At a pH of 3, however, the conditional formation constant (K´ = 1.23)
                                                                              f
                                        2+
                 is so small that very little Ca reacts with the EDTA.                              First
                     Spectrophotometric titrations are particularly useful for the analysis of mixtures  equivalence point
                 if a suitable difference in absorbance exists between the analytes and products, or
                 titrant. For example, the analysis of a two-component mixture can be accomplished
                 if there is a difference between the absorbance of the two metal–ligand complexes  Volume of titrant
                 (Figure 9.33).
                                                                                        Figure 9.33
                                                                                        Spectrophotometric titration curve for the
                  9 D Titrations Based on Redox Reactions                               complexation titration of a mixture.

                 Redox titrations were introduced shortly after the development of acid–base  redox titration
                 titrimetry. The earliest methods took advantage of the oxidizing power of chlorine.  A titration in which the reaction between
                                                                                         the analyte and titrant is an
                 In 1787, Claude Berthollet introduced a method for the quantitative analysis of chlo-
                                                                                         oxidation/reduction reaction.
                 rine water (a mixture of Cl 2 , HCl, and HOCl) based on its ability to oxidize solutions
                 of the dye indigo (indigo is colorless in its oxidized state). In 1814, Joseph Louis Gay-
                 Lussac (1778–1850), developed a similar method for chlorine in bleaching powder.
                 In both methods the end point was signaled visually. Before the equivalence point,
                 the solution remains clear due to the oxidation of indigo. After the equivalence
                 point, however, unreacted indigo imparts a permanent color to the solution.
   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353