Page 182 - Modern Control of DC-Based Power Systems
P. 182

146                                 Modern Control of DC-Based Power Systems


          minimization of a quadratic cost functional. Its synthesis is thus a sub-
          problem of optimal control.
             A common method for the design of a state controller is the pole place-
          ment. The eigenvalues of the closed loop and thus its dynamics are defined
          selectively as it was performed with LSF in Section 5.1.1. The disadvan-
          tages of this method are that the performances of individual states are not
          placed in the foreground and actuator saturation or actuation effort can be
          considered only indirectly. Both are, however, often desired in the practical
          application and are enabled by the LQR controller. For this purpose, a cost
          function J with the following form is assumed for a finite time horizon T.

                                       T
                       1    T         1  ð    T           T
              Ju; x 0 Þ 5 xTðÞ Sx TðÞ 1  ðxTðÞ Qx TðÞ1 utðÞ Ru tðÞÞdt  (5.91)
               ð
                       2              2
                                        0
             The states and actuating variables are factored in quadratically. With
          the weighting matrices S, Q, R the end values of the states, the state tra-
          jectories, and the actuating variable trajectories are prioritized. With the
          diagonal elements of Q the velocity of the single states can be driven to
          zero. If the system has only one input R will be a scalar. The bigger the
          value of R chosen, the slower the control would be. S is used when con-
          sidering a finite time horizon to minimize the final values of the states, if
          the time is not sufficient to drive the states to zero. When considering an
          infinite time horizon, this weighting does not apply because the states for
          t-N have to trend to zero as otherwise the integral would not
          converge.
             The synthesis of this control is highlighted for the infinite time hori-
          zon care in the following steps; for more in depth explanation the reader
          is referred to [33]. A continuous time linear system, defined by:
                                                                      (5.92)
                                   _ x 5 AxðtÞ 1 BuðtÞ
          with a quadratic cost function as defined in (5.93)
                                 N
                                  ð
                                                     T
                                        T
                        Ju; x 0 Þ 5  ðxTðÞ Qx TðÞ1 utðÞ Ru tðÞÞdt     (5.93)
                         ð
                                  0
             The feedback control law that minimizes the value of the cost is given
          by:

                                      u 52 Kx                         (5.94)
   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187