Page 128 - MODERN ELECTROCHEMISTRY
P. 128

68 CHAPTER 2






           where A depends on the electrolyte.
               Bockris and Saluja applied these equations derived by Debye to a number of
           electrolytes and, using data that included information provided by Conway and by
           Zana and Yeager,  calculated the difference of the solvation numbers of the ions of
           salts. The relevant parameters are given in Table 2.6.
               Now, since the ultrasound method gives the difference of the hydration numbers,
           while the compressibility method gave the sum, individual values can be calculated
           (Table 2.7).


           2.9.  SOLVATION NUMBERS AT HIGH CONCENTRATIONS

           2.9.1.  Hydration Numbers from Activity Coefficients

               A nonspectroscopic method that has been used to obtain hydration numbers at
           high concentrations will be described here only in qualitative outline. Understanding
           it quantitatively requires a knowledge of ion–ion interactions, which will be developed
           in Chapter 3. Here, therefore, are just a few words of introduction.
               The basic point is that the mass action laws of chemistry ([A][B]/[AB] = constant)
           do not work for ions in solution. The reason they do not work puzzled chemists for 40
           years before an acceptable theory was found. The answer is based on the effects of
           electrostatic interaction forces between the ions. The mass action laws (in terms of
           concentrations)  work when  there are no  charges on  the particles and hence no
           long-range attraction between them. When the particles are charged, Coulomb’s law
           applies and attractive and repulsive forces (dependent on    where r is the distance
           between the ions) come in. Now the particles are no longer independent but “pull” on
           each other and this impairs the mass action law, the silent assumption of which is that
           ions are free to act alone.
               There are several ways of taking the interionic attraction into account. One can
           work definitionally and deal in a quantity called “activity,” substituting it for concen-
           tration, whereupon (by definition) the mass action law works. Clearly, this approach
           does not help us understand why charges on the particles make the concentration form
           of the mass action law break down.
               From a very dilute solution         to about   mol     the ratio of
           the activity to the concentration (   or the activity coefficient,  ) keeps on getting
           smaller (the deviations from the “independent” state increase with increasing concen-
           tration). Then, somewhere between  and  M solutions of electrolytes such as
           NaCl, the activity coefficient (the arbiter of the deviations) starts to hesitate as to which
           direction to change with increasing concentration; above 1 mol    it turns around and
           increases with increasing concentration. This can be seen schematically in Fig. 2.18.
   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133