Page 102 - Modern Optical Engineering The Design of Optical Systems
P. 102

The Primary Aberrations  85

        reveals that for a given index and thickness, there is an infinite num-
        ber of combinations of  R 1 and  R 2 which will produce a given focal
        length. Thus a lens of some desired power may take on any number of
        different shapes or “bendings.” The aberrations of the lens are changed
        markedly as the shape is changed; this effect is the basic tool of optical
        design.
          As an illustrative example, we will consider the aberrations of a thin
        positive lens made of borosilicate crown glass with a focal length of
        100 mm and a clear aperture of 10 mm (a speed of f/10) which is to
        image an infinitely distant object over a field of view of  17°. A typical
        borosilicate crown is 517:642, which has an index of 1.517 for the
        helium d line (	  5876 Å), an index of 1.51432 for C light (	  6563 Å),
        and an index of 1.52238 for F light (	  4861 Å).
          (The aberration data presented in the following paragraphs were
        calculated by means of the thin-lens third-order aberration equations
        of Chap. 6.)
          If we first assume that the stop or limiting aperture is in coincidence
        with the lens, we find that several aberrations do not vary as the lens
        shape is varied. Axial chromatic aberration is constant at a value of
         1.55 mm (undercorrected); thus the blue focus (F light) is 1.55 mm
        nearer the lens than the red focus (C light). The astigmatism and field
        curvature are also constant. At the edge of the field (30 mm from the
        axis) the sagittal focus is 7.5 mm closer to the lens than the paraxial
        focus, and the tangential focus is 16.5 mm inside the paraxial focus.
        Two aberrations, distortion and lateral color, are zero when the stop is
        at the lens.
          Spherical aberration and coma, however, vary greatly as the lens
        shape is changed. Figure 5.12 shows the amount of these two aberra-
        tions plotted against the curvature of the first surface of the lens.
        Notice that coma varies linearly with lens shape, taking a large positive
        value when the lens is a meniscus with both surfaces concave toward
        the object. As the lens is bent through plano-convex, convex-plano, and
        convex meniscus shapes, the amount of coma becomes more negative,
        assuming a zero value near the convex-plano form.
          The spherical aberration of this lens is always  undercorrected;  its
        plot has the shape of a parabola with a vertical axis. Notice that the
        spherical aberration reaches a minimum (or more accurately, a maximum)
        value at approximately the same shape for which the coma is zero.
        This, then, is the shape that one would select if the lens were to be
        used as a telescope objective to cover a rather small field of view. Note
        that if both object and image are “real” (i.e., not virtual), the spherical
        aberration of a positive lens is always negative (undercorrected).
          Let us now select a particular shape for the lens, say, C 1   0.02
        and investigate the effect of placing the stop away from the lens, as
   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107