Page 123 - Modern Spatiotemporal Geostatistics
P. 123

104       Modern Spatiotemporal Geostatistics —   Chapter  5

        This  paradigm  suggested  certain  essential directions  for  studying  space/time
        variability  and  producing  a map that  can be formalized  in both the  continuum
        and  the  discrete domains.  In the  following  theoretical  analysis,  the  continuum
        mapping  formalization  is  presented  for  reasons  of  mathematical convenience
        and  generality,  but  its  discrete  version  may be  used in  the  implementation  of
        BME  by means of  computer  algorithms.


        The    Prior  Stage

        Each  stage  of  the  BME  analysis  processes  physical  knowledge.  We  do  not
        do  scientific  reasoning  in  a void.  Before we  reason  from  a specificatory data
        set  to  a  particular  map,  we already have  some  general  knowledge about  the
        distribution  of  the  natural  variable or  the  phenomenon been  mapped.  This
        general  knowledge  Q is the  result  of  earlier instances of scientific  reasoning, as
        well  as background  beliefs  relative  to  the  situation  overall  (Chapter  3,  p.  73,
         "The  General  Knowledge Base").


        Map    information   measures   in  light  of general
        knowledge

        Let fg(Xmap) ^e tne multivariate pdf model associated with the general knowl-
        edge  (3,  before any specificatory knowledge S (e.g.,  hard and/or  soft data) has
        been taken into consideration.  As we saw in Chapter 3, the  general knowledge
         (j  considered at  the  prior  stage may be expressed  mathematically  in terms  of
        a  series of functions g a  which  represent known statistics  of the S/TRF  X(p).
        The  fir a's  can be associated with various types of  knowledge about X(p).  Ex-
        amples were given  in  Chapter 3.
            At  the  prior  stage, the  knowledge contained in the  pdf about  the  random
        vector  x map  can  be expressed mathematically  in  terms  of  information  mea-
        sures.  Generally,  the  more probable a model of x map  is, the  more  alternatives
        it  allows; but, it  is also  less  informative.  Conversely, the  more informative  the
        model  is, the  more alternatives  it  excludes. These standard epistemic  rules im-
        ply the  inverse relationship  between prior  information  and probability,  and have
        already  been  discussed  in  the  previous chapter.  There are various  information
        measures satisfying this inverse relation.  One such measure is suggested by  the
        following  postulate.

        POSTULATE 5.1:    Given the general  knowledge  base §, the  information
        contained  in the  map x map  will  be expressed as follows




        which  is sometimes  referred  to  as the  Shannon information measure (see
        also  Eq. 4.2, p. 93).
   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128