Page 78 - Modern Spatiotemporal Geostatistics
P. 78

Spatiotemporal  Geometry                    59

        POSTULATE     2.9:  Complementarity  considers  a  multiple  parallel  pro-
        cessing  of  field  realizations  which  are  diverse  yet  necessary  for  a  com-
        plete  understanding of the  phenomenon  of  interest.
             In light of complementarity,  uncertainty  manifests itself as an ensemble of
        possible  field  realizations that  are all  in  agreement with what  is known  about
        the phenomenon of interest.  These realizations are different  but  complementary
        facets of the description  of the actual phenomenon.  In other words, the  different
        realizations  are not  contradictions,  rather,  they  are complementary  aspects of
        a  seamless unity.
            The concept  of complementarity includes the actual (but  usually unknown
        to  us)  realization  of  the  natural  field as well  as several non-actual  but  possible
        field  realizations.  While the  actual  realization  is located  in the  physical world,
        the  possible  realizations  are  located  in  a  conceptual  (or  logical)  world.  A
         "possible  field  realization"  is not  the  same as a  "conceivable  field  realization."
        Just  as there  exist  possible realizations that are not conceivable (on the  basis of
        our current knowledge,  technological  abilities, etc.), there  also exist conceivable
        realizations  that  are not  possible  because  they  violate  rules  of  logic,  natural
        laws,  etc.  In  science,  we  consider  only  physically  possible  realizations,  i.e.,
        realizations  which  are characterized  by  the  same  physical  laws,  data,  etc.  as
        the  actual  realization  of the  natural  field.

        COMMENT  2.9 : Complementarity   ma y offer   a n interesting   interpretation






         of th e cause-effect   concept:   I n mathematical   logic,  the use o f material condi-


        tionals fi.e. , propositions  of the form  "ifxi>   thenxz"   o r "xi   ~ > Xi,"  where.



        Xi is   the   antecedent  and  X2 is  the   consequent)  requires  us  to  admit  various

        possible realizations   besides  the   actual   (but   unknown)  one.   A   conditional


         then may   be   true  not   in   terms   of   how   things   are,   but   of   how   they   would

         be in   an   appropriate   field   realization.   A   conditional  xi—>   X2   is  true   in   a


         realization if  X2  is  true  in  the   same  realization in which xi is   also  true.  In


         other words,  an   event  xi  fnay   be  considered  as   causing an  event  X2  if  both



        Xi and   X2  occur in the   observed   realization,  but  in  the   vast  majority  of   the
         other realizations in  which xidoes   not  occur,   X2 does  not  occur  either.  We


         revisit material  conditionals in  Chapter 4-
         Putting Things       Together:     The    Spatiotemporal
         Random      Field   Concept
         Spatiotemporal  random  field  (S/TRF)  modeling  of natural  phenomena has led
        to  considerable  successes over  the  last  few  decades.  Conceptually,  the  S/TRF
         model  is  a  combination  of  the  three  fundamental  ideas  (the  Spatiotemporal
        continuum, field,  and complementarity) of the  preceding  sections.  Here we will
         use  large  and  small  Roman  characters to  denote  random  fields  and  random
        variables,  respectively;  Greek  characters will  be  used  to  denote  realizations
         (data  values,  etc.).  The  following S/TRF  definition  is often  used  in  modern
        Spatiotemporal geostatistics.
   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83