Page 32 - Multidimensional Chromatography
P. 32

22                                      Multidimensional Chromatography

                           Transfer of an LC fraction of 300 l volume occurred by the conventional retention
                           gap technique. In fact, Figure 2.3(b) shows the GC chromatogram obtained after the
                           transfer of the LC fraction.
                             An additional technique, called ‘partially concurrent eluent evaporation,’has been
                           introduced in order to overcome some drawbacks of the retention gap technique. In
                           this case, a large amount of solvent is evaporated during introduction (concurrently),
                           yet still producing a zone flooded by the eluent, thus providing solvent trapping (5).
                           This technique allows the use of shorter retention gaps or larger transfer volumes. In
                           theory, an early vapour exit (6) should be placed between the uncoated precolumn
                           and the main column, but in practice a short section of the main column (7) is placed
                           between the precolumn and the vapor exit, so rendering the closure of the vent less
                           critical.
                             In particular, Figure 2.4(a) (7) shows the LC chromatogram of fat extracted from
                           an irradiated chicken. Irradiation of foods containing fat produces radiolysis frag-
                           ments of triglycerides, such as acids, propanediol esters, alkenes, aldehydes and
                           methyl esters. The alkane/alkene fraction transferred to the gas chromatograph cor-
                           respond to the first 200 l eluted after the dead volume. The second fraction of inter-
                           est was that of the aldehydes, eluted after a few minutes. The two fractions (Figure
                           2.4(b)), both of about 200 l, were transferred by partially concurrent eluent evapo-
                           ration by using a precolumn of 12 m   0.50 mm id, with a 3 m   0.32 mm id fused
                           silica section of the separation column serving as a retaining precolumn before the
                           solvent vapour exit.


                           2.2.2  LOOP-TYPE INTERFACES (CONCURRENT
                           ELUENT EVAPORATION)

                           The retention gap techniques, essential for the analysis of very volatile components,
                           are often replaced by concurrent eluent evaporation techniques, due to their simplic-
                           ity and the possibility of transfering very large amount of solvent. In this case, the
                           solvents are introduced into an uncoated inlet at temperatures at or above the solvent
                           boiling point.
                             In this way, the liquid can be transferred at a speed corresponding to the evapora-
                           tion speed. The fraction to be analysed is contained in a loop (see Figure 2.5), con-
                           nected to a switching valve. By opening the valve, the sample in the loop is driven by
                           the carrier gas into the GC unit (8), instead of the LC pump. An early vapour exit is
                           usually placed after a few metres of the deactivated precolumn (9) and a short piece
                           (3–4 m) of the main column (retaining precolumn). This valve is opened during sol-
                           vent evaporation in order to reduce the amount of solvent that would reach the detec-
                           tor, and at the same time, to increase the solvent evaporation rate (6).
                             When the sample solvent evaporates at the front end of the liquid, volatile com-
                           pounds co-evaporate with the solvent and start moving through the main column. In
                           this way, volatile components can be lost through the early vapour exit or, if venting
                           is delayed, the most volatile compounds reach the detector even before the end of
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37