Page 359 - Multidimensional Chromatography
P. 359

350                                     Multidimensional Chromatography



























                           Figure 13.7 Selectivity effected by employing different step gradients in the coupled-
                           column RPLC analysis of a surface water containing 0.40  g l  1  bentazone, by using direct
                           sample injection (2.00 ml). Clean-up volumes, (a), (c) and (d) 4.65 ml of M-1, and (b) 3.75 ml
                           of M-1: transfer volumes, (a), (c) and (d), 0.50 ml of M-1, and (b), 0.40 ml of M-1. The
                           displayed chromatograms start after clean-up on the first column. Reprinted from Journal
                           of Chromatography, A 644, E. A. Hogendoorn et al., ‘Coupled-column reversed-phase liquid
                           chromatography-UV analyser for the determination of polar pesticides in water’,
                           pp. 307–314, copyright 1993, with permission from Elsevier Science.


                             The experimental conditions are shown in Table 13.1, while Figure 13.9 shows
                           the chromatogram of a soil sample extract spiked with fenpropimorph obtained by
                           this method, plus the chromatogram from the two columns connected in series with-
                           out column switching.
                             In multiresidue analysis, where more analytes with a wide polarity range need to
                           be determined, large transfer volumes are required, and consequently, the selectivity
                           is lower. However, since the major interferences in water analysis are the polar
                           humic and fulvic acids, removing this early eluting interference in coupled-column
                           RPLC will also be feasible in multiresidue methodology.
                             Several examples have been described in the literature, and some of these are
                           included in Table 13.1.
                             For instance, a group of triazine herbicides has been determined in environmen-
                           tal water samples. In this example (33), a group of four triazines (simazine,
                           atrazine, terbuthylazine and terbutryn) were determined by LC–LC by using the
                           experimental conditions specified in Table 13.1. The flow-rate was 1 ml min   1  in
                           both cases.  The total analysis time was only 7 min, which enables a sample
                           throughput of up to 60 samples per day. However, the limits of detection from this
                                                            1
                           system were only about 0.1–0.15  g l , which is not enough for drinking water
                           according to EEC regulations. These authors proposed a solid-phase extraction step
   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364