Page 107 - Museums, Media and Cultural Theory In Cultural and Media Studies
P. 107

MEDIA ||  91

                  but also how museums have incorporated various modern media. In particular
                  the move toward computers as display devices, and the association of com-
                  puters with interactivity, has had an impact on long-established notions of
                  hands-on experience and education in museums (in Chapter 5, there is further
                  discussion of the role of new media and information technologies in the
                  museum). However, as I have suggested, the move away from artefacts is not a
                  rejection of a somatic and sensory address to the visitor; rather it involves a
                  greater emphasis on the visitor’s own perceptions and body.
                    The philosopher Hilde Hein has argued that museums in general have moved
                  from focusing on objects to an emphasis on the subject (2000: 66). Museums
                  have become increasingly  ‘people-centred’, attentive to visitors’ own experi-
                  ences and values. Importantly, this does not mean that these are equally valued.
                  Indeed, one aspect of the change in museums which Hein describes is their
                  self-perception as institutions devoted to shaping the values and beliefs of the
                  public. For instance, the new National Museum of the American Indian in
                  Washington DC has issued brochures describing the museum’s aim ‘to change
                  forever the way people view Native peoples of this hemisphere. To correct
                  misconceptions. To end prejudice. To stop injustice. And to demonstrate how
                  Indian culture has enriched the world’ (NMAI brochure, 2004). The project
                  director at the Holocaust Memorial Museum, also in Washington DC, stated
                  that it ‘recast the story of the Holocaust to teach fundamental American values
                  . . . pluralism, democracy, restraint on government, the inalienable rights of
                  individuals, the inability of governments to enter into freedom of religion’
                  (cited in Gourevitch 1993: 55). Dawn Casey, the director of the National
                  Museum of Australia, faced with criticism regarding the museum’s representa-
                  tion of the early conflict between the first Australians and the European colon-
                  ists, argued: ‘We see our role as changing people’s attitudes’ (Griffin 2002).
                    Hein argues that this emphasis on values and attitudes entails an increased
                  appeal to people’s emotional and sensory responses. She diagnoses a tendency
                  toward the use of objects in simulations and reconstructions to elicit subjective
                  sensations, emotions and feelings, rather than as objects of knowledge that
                  might  ‘speak for themselves’ (Hein 2000: 79). Museums are increasingly
                  involved in the manufacture of experience (Hein 2000: 67). Hein uses the word
                  ‘experience’ to refer to a concept of subjective aesthetic experience, which
                  emerges in part in the art theory of John Dewey. Dewey shifted the emphasis
                  from the art object (prioritized in traditional aesthetics) to the viewer’s experi-
                  ence in its presence. Experience-oriented exhibits are story-centred, like media
                  texts. They rely less on the authenticity and specific provenance of objects than
                  on their ‘corroborative power’ (Hein 2000: 61). Like a television programme in
                  which pieces of footage can be edited together to produce a sense of a place or
                  time without deriving from that actual place and time, such story-centred
   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112